↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV251-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 86.69s 12.70s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 86.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  35 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   18 (  10   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   89 (   0 sgn  89   !;   0   ?;  52   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3175,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : c_union(X0,c_minus(X1,X0,tc_set(X2)),X2) = c_union(X0,X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__Diff__cancel_0) ).

fof(f3176,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : c_union(X0,X1,X2) = c_union(X0,c_minus(X1,X0,tc_set(X2)),X2),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f3175]) ).

fof(f3181,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_union(X0,X0,X1) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__absorb_0) ).

fof(f3193,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : c_union(c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X3,X2) = c_insert(X0,c_union(X1,X3,X2),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__insert__left_0) ).

fof(f3194,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : c_union(X0,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3) = c_insert(X1,c_union(X0,X2,X3),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__insert__right_0) ).

fof(f3236,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_minus(c_insert(X0,X3,X2),X1,tc_set(X2)) = c_minus(X3,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_Oinsert__Diff1_0) ).

fof(f3237,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_minus(X3,X1,tc_set(X2)) = c_minus(c_insert(X0,X3,X2),X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f3236]) ).

fof(f3252,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : c_in(X0,c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_Oinsert__iff_1) ).

fof(f3371,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : c_union(X0,c_union(X1,X0,X2),X2) = c_union(X1,X0,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-0.ax',cls_Message_Ostrange__Un__eq_0) ).

fof(f3372,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : c_union(X1,X0,X2) = c_union(X0,c_union(X1,X0,X2),X2),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f3371]) ).

fof(f3388,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-1.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).

fof(f3430,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),X1,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__analz__Un_0) ).

fof(f3436,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f3437,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f3438,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

tcf(c_2880,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3436]) ).

tcf(c_2881,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3437]) ).

tcf(c_2882,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3438]) ).

tcf(c_2892,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),X1,tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3430]) ).

tcf(c_2900,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3388]) ).

tcf(c_2912,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_in(X0,c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3252]) ).

tcf(c_2916,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( c_minus(c_insert(X0,X3,X2),X1,tc_set(X2)) = c_minus(X3,X1,tc_set(X2)) )
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3237]) ).

tcf(c_2922,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_union(X0,c_union(X1,X0,X2),X2) = c_union(X1,X0,X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3372]) ).

tcf(c_2926,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : c_union(X0,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3) = c_insert(X1,c_union(X0,X2,X3),X3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3194]) ).

tcf(c_2927,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : c_union(c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X3,X2) = c_insert(X0,c_union(X1,X3,X2),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3193]) ).

tcf(c_2936,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_union(X0,X0,X1) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3181]) ).

tcf(c_2939,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_union(X0,c_minus(X1,X0,tc_set(X2)),X2) = c_union(X0,X1,X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3176]) ).

tcf(c_26064,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2892,c_2900]) ).

tcf(c_26146,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(X2,c_insert(X1,X3,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_insert(X1,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2926,c_26064]) ).

tcf(c_26989,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(X1,c_union(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_insert(X1,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_26146,c_2926]) ).

tcf(c_26996,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(X0,c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2912,c_26989]) ).

tcf(c_27147,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2936,c_26996]) ).

tcf(c_46178,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_minus(c_insert(v_X,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_minus(X0,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2880,c_2916]) ).

tcf(c_46179,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_minus(c_insert(v_x,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) = c_minus(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2881,c_2916]) ).

tcf(c_47367,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),c_minus(X0,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) = c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),c_insert(v_X,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_46178,c_2939]) ).

tcf(c_47451,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_minus(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) = c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_insert(v_x,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_46179,c_2939]) ).

tcf(c_49311,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_insert(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),X0,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) = c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),X0,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_47367,c_2939,c_2926]) ).

tcf(c_52661,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_insert(v_x,c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),X0,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) = c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),X0,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_47451,c_2939,c_2926]) ).

tcf(c_52678,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),X0,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52661,c_27147]) ).

tcf(c_81331,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,c_union(v_H,X0,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52678,c_2892,c_2927]) ).

tcf(c_81333,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,c_union(X0,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2922,c_81331]) ).

tcf(c_127618,plain,
    c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49311,c_81333]) ).

tcf(c_127627,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_127618,c_2882]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SWV251-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/0.42  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.42  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:53:20 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.42  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.24/0.52  % Proving...
% 86.69/12.70  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 86.69/12.70  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % ------  iProver source info
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 86.69/12.70  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 86.69/12.70  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 34  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 12  sf_s  rm: 7 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 7 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 86.69/12.70  % ------ Proving...
% 86.69/12.70  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % 
% 86.69/12.70  % clauses                               457
% 86.69/12.70  % conjectures                           3
% 86.69/12.70  % EPR                                   22
% 86.69/12.70  % Horn                                  405
% 86.69/12.70  % unary                                 176
% 86.69/12.70  % binary                                202
% 86.69/12.70  % lits                                  819
% 86.69/12.70  % lits eq                               316
% 86.69/12.70  % fd_pure                               0
% 86.69/12.70  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 86.69/12.70  % fd_cond                               28
% 86.69/12.70  % fd_pseudo_cond                        25
% 86.69/12.70  % AC symbols                            0
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % ------ 
% 86.69/12.70  % Current options:
% 86.69/12.70  % ------ 
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % 
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % ------ Proving...
% 86.69/12.70  % 
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 86.69/12.70  
% 86.69/12.70  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------