↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV251-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.43s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   28 (   0 equ;  12 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(u,v,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(u),c_Message_Oanalz(v),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('SWV251-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    equal(c_union(u,c_minus(v,u,tc_set(w)),w),c_union(u,v,w)),
    file('SWV251-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_union(u,v,w),x,tc_set(w))
    | c_lessequals(v,x,tc_set(w)) ),
    file('SWV251-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(u,v,w)
    | equal(c_minus(c_insert(u,x,w),v,tc_set(w)),c_minus(x,v,tc_set(w))) ),
    file('SWV251-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(u,v,w)
    | ~ c_lessequals(v,x,tc_set(w))
    | c_in(u,x,w) ),
    file('SWV251-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    c_lessequals(u,u,tc_set(v)),
    file('SWV251-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('SWV251-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('SWV251-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ~ c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('SWV251-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),u,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_in(v_x,u,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[12,8]),
    [iquote('0:Res:12.0,8.0')] ).

cnf(25,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),u,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(u),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,17]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.1,17.0')] ).

cnf(28,plain,
    c_lessequals(u,c_union(v,u,w),tc_set(w)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[10,5]),
    [iquote('0:Res:10.0,5.0')] ).

cnf(112,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(u,v,w)
    | equal(c_union(v,c_minus(x,v,tc_set(w)),w),c_union(v,c_insert(u,x,w),w)) ),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,3]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:7.1,3.0')] ).

cnf(113,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(u,v,w)
    | equal(c_union(v,c_insert(u,x,w),w),c_union(v,x,w)) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,112]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:3.0,112.1')] ).

cnf(122,plain,
    c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(u,c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[28,25]),
    [iquote('0:Res:28.0,25.0')] ).

cnf(175,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(v_X,u,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(v_x,c_Message_Oanalz(c_union(u,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[113,122]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:113.1,122.0')] ).

cnf(212,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(v_G)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[175,13]),
    [iquote('0:Res:175.1,13.0')] ).

cnf(213,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[212,11]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:212.0,11.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWV251-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.19/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.19/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 03:52:33 EDT 2022
% 0.19/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.43  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS derived 193 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 116 clauses.
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS allocated 63390 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS spent	0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 18 :
% 0.19/0.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.43  Formulae used in the proof : cls_Message_Oanalz__mono_0 cls_Set_OUn__Diff__cancel_0 cls_Set_OUn__subset__iff_1 cls_Set_Oinsert__Diff1_0 cls_Set_OsubsetD_0 cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0 cls_conjecture_0 cls_conjecture_1 cls_conjecture_2
% 0.19/0.43  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------