↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SWV255-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:58:34 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.36s 7.60s
% Output   : Refutation 3.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  146 (  12   ~;  10   |;   0   &; 124   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   9 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   15 (  14 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0   ^;  20   !;   0   ?;  20   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(c_lessequals_decl,type,
    c_lessequals: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(v_xb_decl,type,
    v_xb: $i > $i ).

thf(tc_nat_decl,type,
    tc_nat: $i ).

thf(c_in_decl,type,
    c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce_decl,type,
    c_Message_Omsg_ONonce: $i > $i ).

thf(c_Message_Oparts_decl,type,
    c_Message_Oparts: $i > $i ).

thf(c_insert_decl,type,
    c_insert: $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(v_msg1_decl,type,
    v_msg1: $i ).

thf(c_emptyset_decl,type,
    c_emptyset: $i ).

thf(tc_Message_Omsg_decl,type,
    tc_Message_Omsg: $i ).

thf(v_x_decl,type,
    v_x: $i ).

thf(v_msg2_decl,type,
    v_msg2: $i ).

thf(v_xa_decl,type,
    v_xa: $i ).

thf(c_plus_decl,type,
    c_plus: $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( c_emptyset @ ( v_msg1 @ c_insert ) ) @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( A @ v_xb @ c_Message_Omsg_ONonce @ c_in ) ) )
      | ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( c_emptyset @ ( v_msg2 @ c_insert ) ) @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( A @ v_xb @ c_Message_Omsg_ONonce @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( c_emptyset @ ( v_msg1 @ c_insert ) ) @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( A @ v_xb @ c_Message_Omsg_ONonce @ c_in ) ) )
      | ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( c_emptyset @ ( v_msg2 @ c_insert ) ) @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( A @ v_xb @ c_Message_Omsg_ONonce @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_nat @ ( C @ ( B @ c_lessequals ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_nat @ ( C @ ( tc_nat @ ( B @ ( A @ c_plus ) ) @ c_lessequals ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_nat @ ( C @ ( B @ c_lessequals ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_nat @ ( C @ ( tc_nat @ ( B @ ( A @ c_plus ) ) @ c_lessequals ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( tc_nat @ ( A @ ( v_xa @ c_lessequals ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( c_emptyset @ ( v_msg2 @ c_insert ) ) @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( A @ c_Message_Omsg_ONonce @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( tc_nat @ ( A @ ( v_xa @ c_lessequals ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( c_emptyset @ ( v_msg2 @ c_insert ) ) @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( A @ c_Message_Omsg_ONonce @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] : ( tc_nat @ ( A @ v_xb @ ( A @ c_lessequals ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( tc_nat @ ( A @ v_xb @ ( A @ c_lessequals ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_nat @ ( C @ ( A @ c_lessequals ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_nat @ ( C @ ( tc_nat @ ( B @ ( A @ c_plus ) ) @ c_lessequals ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_1) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_nat @ ( C @ ( A @ c_lessequals ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_nat @ ( C @ ( tc_nat @ ( B @ ( A @ c_plus ) ) @ c_lessequals ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( tc_nat @ ( A @ ( v_x @ c_lessequals ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( c_emptyset @ ( v_msg1 @ c_insert ) ) @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( A @ c_Message_Omsg_ONonce @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( tc_nat @ ( A @ ( v_x @ c_lessequals ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( c_emptyset @ ( v_msg1 @ c_insert ) ) @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( A @ c_Message_Omsg_ONonce @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,14,9,7,16,8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV255-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.15/5.44  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/5.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/5.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/5.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/5.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/5.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/5.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/5.44  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:23:16 UTC 2026
% 0.15/5.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/5.45  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.95/6.22  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.11/6.42  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (200ms). 
% 1.11/6.43  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.76/6.87  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.76/6.87  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.92/6.97  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 2 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.92/7.02  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 2 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.92/7.02  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 1.92/7.02  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.92/7.03  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.17/7.60  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.36/7.60  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.36/7.60  % Time passed: 1891ms (effective reasoning time: 1166ms)
% 3.36/7.60  % Axioms used in derivation (2): cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0, cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_1
% 3.36/7.60  % No. of inferences in proof: 13
% 3.36/7.60  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1891 ms resp. 1166 ms w/o parsing
% 3.36/7.63  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.36/7.63  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------