↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWV255-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:32:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   5 unt;   1 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   15 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(X,v_xb(X),tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_msg1,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_x,X,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_msg2,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_xa,X,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xb(X)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_msg2,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xb(X)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_msg1,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X,Y,tc_nat),Z,tc_nat)
    | c_lessequals(Y,Z,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0) ).

cnf(cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X,Y,tc_nat),Z,tc_nat)
    | c_lessequals(X,Z,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_1) ).

cnf(7,plain,
    c_lessequals(X,v_xb(c_plus(Y,X,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_0,cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(8,plain,
    c_lessequals(X,v_xb(c_plus(X,Y,tc_nat)),tc_nat),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Nat_Oadd__leE_1,cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(14,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_xb(c_plus(X,v_xa,tc_nat))),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_msg1,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2,7,cls_conjecture_3]) ).

cnf(65,plain,
    $false,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1,14,8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14  % Problem  : SWV255-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 18:46:55 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.49  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.51   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.22/0.51   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.22/0.51   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  "."
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T18:46:55
% 0.22/0.51  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n003.cluster.edu at 2022-06-14T18:46:55
% 0.22/0.52  
% 0.22/0.55  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_lessequals| ?X (|v_xb| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  #||
% 0.22/0.55  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.55  ||#
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.22/0.55  ;        87 formulas have been input or derived (from 28 formulas).
% 0.22/0.55  ;        65 (75%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.22/0.55  ;           65 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.22/0.55  ; 
% 0.22/0.55  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.002   5%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.001   3%   Assert                       (6 calls)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.003   8%   Process new row              (78 calls)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.003   8%   Resolution                   (54 calls)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.001   3%   Paramodulation               (27 calls)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (1 call)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.001   3%   Condensing                   (5 calls)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (5 calls)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (5 calls)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (2 calls)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.004  11%   Forward simplification       (78 calls)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.002   5%   Backward simplification      (65 calls)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (1 call)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.001   3%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.020  53%   Other
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.038        Total
% 0.22/0.55  ;     0.040        Real time
% 0.22/0.55  ; 
% 0.22/0.55  ; Term-hash-array has 169 terms in all.
% 0.22/0.55  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 5 entries (5 at peak, 5 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.22/0.55  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 57 nodes (57 at peak, 57 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.22/0.55  ;  Retrieved 1 possibly forward subsuming row in 5 calls.
% 0.22/0.55  ;  Retrieved 1 possibly backward subsumed row in 5 calls.
% 0.22/0.55  ; Path-index has 176 entries (176 at peak, 176 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.22/0.55  ; Path-index has 382 nodes (382 at peak, 382 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.22/0.55  ; Trie-index has 176 entries (176 at peak, 176 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.22/0.55  ; Trie-index has 719 nodes (719 at peak, 719 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.22/0.55  ; Retrieved 102 generalization terms in 76 calls.
% 0.22/0.55  ; Retrieved 66 instance terms in 59 calls.
% 0.22/0.55  ; Retrieved 406 unifiable terms in 293 calls.
% 0.22/0.55  ; 
% 0.22/0.55  ; The agenda of rows to process has 1 entry:
% 0.22/0.55  ;     1 with value 14
% 0.22/0.55  ; The agenda of rows to give has 37 entries:
% 0.22/0.55  ;     9 with value (4 19)          8 with value (4 23)          12 with value (4 24)
% 0.22/0.55  ;     8 with value (4 22)
% 0.22/0.55  Evaluation took:
% 0.22/0.55    0.04 seconds of real time
% 0.22/0.55    0.030345 seconds of user run time
% 0.22/0.55    0.010281 seconds of system run time
% 0.22/0.55    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.22/0.55    0 page faults and
% 0.22/0.55    2,600,232 bytes consed.
% 0.22/0.55  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.40/0.55  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T18:46:55
% 0.40/0.55  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.40/0.55  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------