↑ Up

Drodi-SAT---4.1.1.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi-SAT---4.1.1
% Problem  : SWV256-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:50:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.56s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV256-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.52  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.52  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.52  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.52  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.52  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.52  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.52  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.52  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:41:09 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.52  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.53  % Drodi V4.1.1
% 0.10/0.56  % Refutation found
% 0.10/0.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark: Theory is unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.56  fof(f1,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.10/0.56    ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
% 0.10/0.56    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.10/0.56  fof(f2,axiom,(
% 0.10/0.56    (![V_H]: (c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ))),
% 0.10/0.56    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.10/0.56  fof(f3,axiom,(
% 0.10/0.56    (![V_G,V_H]: (( ~ c_lessequals(V_G,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(V_G),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ) ))),
% 0.10/0.56    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.10/0.56  fof(f4,plain,(
% 0.10/0.56    ~c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))),
% 0.10/0.56    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 0.10/0.56  fof(f5,plain,(
% 0.10/0.56    ![X0]: (c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)))),
% 0.10/0.56    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 0.10/0.56  fof(f6,plain,(
% 0.10/0.56    ![X0,X1]: (~c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))|c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)))),
% 0.10/0.56    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 0.10/0.56  fof(f7,plain,(
% 0.10/0.56    ~c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))),
% 0.10/0.56    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f6,f4])).
% 0.10/0.56  fof(f8,plain,(
% 0.10/0.56    $false),
% 0.10/0.56    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f7,f5])).
% 0.10/0.56  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.58  % Elapsed time: 0.054682 seconds
% 0.16/0.58  % CPU time: 0.148833 seconds
% 0.16/0.58  % Total memory used: 55.277 MB
% 0.16/0.58  % Net memory used: 54.627 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------