↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SWV256-2 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 25 04:46:24 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SWV256-2 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul 22 08:36:49 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: cnf(0, plain, ~c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_0])).
% 0.12/0.34  9
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(l0, plain, ~c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [0])).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(2, plain, ~c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1])).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(l1, plain, ~c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [2])).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(1, plain, c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__parts_0])).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(l2, plain, c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [1])).
% 0.12/0.34  cnf(final, plain, $false, inference(ground_refutation, [status(thm)], [l0, l1, l2])).
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------