%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV256-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:49 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.87s 1.31s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.87s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 13 unt; 4 def)
% Number of atoms : 54 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 9 ~; 6 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 5 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn 11 !; 0 ?; 8 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0] : c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__parts_0) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1) ).
tcf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_53,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_54,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tcf(c_65,definition,
iPr_def_10 = c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_66,definition,
iPr_def_11 = c_Message_Oparts(iPr_def_10),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_67,definition,
iPr_def_12 = c_Message_Oparts(v_H),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_68,definition,
iPr_def_13 = tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).
tcf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_68,c_67,c_65,c_66]) ).
tcf(c_176,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X0),iPr_def_13),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_68]) ).
tcf(c_178,plain,
c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_176]) ).
tcf(c_180,plain,
c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_178,c_65]) ).
tcf(c_182,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),iPr_def_13)
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),iPr_def_13) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_68]) ).
tcf(c_187,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13)
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),iPr_def_13) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_182]) ).
tcf(c_192,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13)
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_187,c_67]) ).
tcf(c_226,plain,
( c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13)
| ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_192]) ).
tcf(c_227,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_226,c_69,c_180]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV256-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:54:13 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.43
% 0.12/0.43 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.43
% 0.12/0.43 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.45 % Proving...
% 1.87/1.31 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.87/1.31 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.87/1.31 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.87/1.31 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.87/1.31 % ------ Proving...
% 1.87/1.31 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 %
% 1.87/1.31 % clauses 7
% 1.87/1.31 % conjectures 1
% 1.87/1.31 % EPR 1
% 1.87/1.31 % Horn 7
% 1.87/1.31 % unary 6
% 1.87/1.31 % binary 1
% 1.87/1.31 % lits 8
% 1.87/1.31 % lits eq 4
% 1.87/1.31 % fd_pure 0
% 1.87/1.31 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.87/1.31 % fd_cond 0
% 1.87/1.31 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.87/1.31 % AC symbols 0
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 % ------
% 1.87/1.31 % Current options:
% 1.87/1.31 % ------
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 %
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 % ------ Proving...
% 1.87/1.31 %
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.87/1.31
% 1.87/1.31
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------