%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV257-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:49 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.20s 6.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 12 ~; 8 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 18 !; 0 ?; 11 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3377,axiom,
! [X0] : c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__increasing_0) ).
fof(f3392,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0) ).
fof(f3394,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_0) ).
fof(f3395,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1) ).
fof(f3396,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
tcf(c_2842,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3396]) ).
tcf(c_2856,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3395]) ).
tcf(c_2857,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3394]) ).
tcf(c_2859,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3392]) ).
tcf(c_2868,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3377]) ).
tcf(c_3809,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_2859,c_2857]) ).
tcf(c_15191,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_3809]) ).
tcf(c_29047,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2856,c_2842]) ).
tcf(c_29140,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_15191,c_29047]) ).
tcf(c_29141,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_29140,c_2868]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV257-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.37 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/5.37 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:00:45 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/5.37 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/5.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.43
% 0.15/5.43 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/5.43
% 0.15/5.43 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/5.44 % Proving...
% 2.20/6.74 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.20/6.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 % ------ iProver source info
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.20/6.74 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.20/6.74 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 34 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e sup_sim: 12 sf_s rm: 7 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 7 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.20/6.74 % ------ Proving...
% 2.20/6.74 % ------ Problem Properties
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 %
% 2.20/6.74 % clauses 453
% 2.20/6.74 % conjectures 1
% 2.20/6.74 % EPR 22
% 2.20/6.74 % Horn 401
% 2.20/6.74 % unary 173
% 2.20/6.74 % binary 201
% 2.20/6.74 % lits 814
% 2.20/6.74 % lits eq 317
% 2.20/6.74 % fd_pure 0
% 2.20/6.74 % fd_pseudo 0
% 2.20/6.74 % fd_cond 28
% 2.20/6.74 % fd_pseudo_cond 27
% 2.20/6.74 % AC symbols 0
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 % ------
% 2.20/6.74 % Current options:
% 2.20/6.74 % ------
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 %
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 % ------ Proving...
% 2.20/6.74 %
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.20/6.74
% 2.20/6.74
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------