%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SWV257-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:06:35 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.08s 0.23s
% Output : Proof 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV257-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.17 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.17 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.17 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.17 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.17 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.17 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.17 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.17 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 10:14:35 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.17 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.17 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.23 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 0.08/0.23
% 0.08/0.23 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.08/0.23
% 0.08/0.23 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.08/0.23 Axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.08/0.23 Axiom 2 (cls_Message_Oanalz__increasing_0): c_lessequals(X, c_Message_Oanalz(X), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) = true.
% 0.08/0.24 Axiom 3 (cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0): ifeq(c_lessequals(X, Y, tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), true, c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X), c_Message_Oparts(Y), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), true) = true.
% 0.08/0.24
% 0.08/0.24 Goal 1 (cls_conjecture_0): c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H), c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) = true.
% 0.08/0.24 Proof:
% 0.08/0.24 c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H), c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
% 0.08/0.24 = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.08/0.24 ifeq(true, true, c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H), c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), true)
% 0.08/0.24 = { by axiom 2 (cls_Message_Oanalz__increasing_0) R->L }
% 0.08/0.24 ifeq(c_lessequals(v_H, c_Message_Oanalz(v_H), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), true, c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H), c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), true)
% 0.08/0.24 = { by axiom 3 (cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0) }
% 0.08/0.24 true
% 0.08/0.24 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.08/0.24
% 0.08/0.24 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------