%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV259-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:50 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.34s 1.09s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 9 ~; 6 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 0 sgn 23 !; 0 ?; 13 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f131,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : c_lessequals(X0,X0,tc_set(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).
fof(f3258,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_lessequals(X1,X3,tc_set(X2))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X3,tc_set(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_Oinsert__subset_1) ).
fof(f3378,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_0) ).
fof(f3379,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_1) ).
fof(f3381,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
tcf(c_2938,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,X0,tc_set(X1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f131]) ).
tcf(c_4923,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_lessequals(X1,X3,tc_set(X2))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X3,tc_set(X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3258]) ).
tcf(c_5009,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3378]) ).
tcf(c_5010,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3379]) ).
tcf(c_5012,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3381]) ).
tcf(c_5312,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5010,c_5012]) ).
tcf(c_5322,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2938,c_5009]) ).
tcf(c_5841,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,X0,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5322,c_4923]) ).
tcf(c_5843,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5312,c_5841]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV259-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:56:09 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.42 % Proving...
% 1.34/1.09 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.34/1.09 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.34/1.09 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.34/1.09 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.34/1.09 % ------ Proving...
% 1.34/1.09 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09 %
% 1.34/1.09 % clauses 2185
% 1.34/1.09 % conjectures 2
% 1.34/1.09 % EPR 668
% 1.34/1.09 % Horn 1997
% 1.34/1.09 % unary 644
% 1.34/1.09 % binary 1097
% 1.34/1.09 % lits 4398
% 1.34/1.09 % lits eq 1212
% 1.34/1.09 % fd_pure 0
% 1.34/1.09 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.34/1.09 % fd_cond 118
% 1.34/1.09 % fd_pseudo_cond 77
% 1.34/1.09 % AC symbols 0
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09 % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09 % ------
% 1.34/1.09 % Current options:
% 1.34/1.09 % ------
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09 %
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09 % ------ Proving...
% 1.34/1.09 %
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.34/1.09
% 1.34/1.09
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------