↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV261-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:08 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   36 (   9 unt;   7 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   71 (   5 equ;  31 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   99 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__trans_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X4,X1,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_lessequals(X4,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__trans_0) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
    | c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OinsertE_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_insert(X2,X3,X4),X4)
    | X1 = X2
    | c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OinsertE_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OUnCI_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUnCI_1) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_0,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_G),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__Un__subset2_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__Un__subset2_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X4,X1,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_lessequals(X4,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_Osubset__trans_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
    | c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetI_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_insert(X2,X3,X4),X4)
    | X1 = X2
    | c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OinsertE_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X4,X1,tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_lessequals(X4,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUnCI_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
    | c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_insert(X2,X3,X4),X4)
    | X1 = X2
    | c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(X3))
    | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,X2,X3),X1,X3) ),
    cls_Set_OsubsetI_0 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_G),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X3,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X3),X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_union(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    cls_Message_Oparts__Un__subset2_0 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X4,X3),X3) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4),X3,X4)
    | c_lessequals(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),tc_set(X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X4,X3),X2,X3)
    | c_lessequals(c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_set(X3))
    | c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X4,X3) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_G),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_union(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X1),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4),X2,X4)
    | c_lessequals(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),tc_set(X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(c_insert(X1,X2,X3),c_union(X4,X2,X3),tc_set(X3))
    | c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(X1,X2,X3),c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),c_union(v_G,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,X4,X3)
    | c_lessequals(c_insert(X1,X2,X3),c_union(X4,X2,X3),tc_set(X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV261-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:36:49 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.47  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.47  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.47  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.47  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.47  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.47  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.47  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2732761 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.47  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.47  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.47  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.47  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.47  % Search class: FGUSF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.47  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.47  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.47  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.47  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.47  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.47  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.47  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2732767 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.47  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.47  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.47  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.47  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.47  % Search class: FGUSF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.47  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.47  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.47  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.47  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.47  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.47  
% 0.12/0.47  % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.47  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.47  % Parsed axioms                        : 10
% 0.12/0.47  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Initial clauses                      : 10
% 0.12/0.47  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
% 0.12/0.47  % Processed clauses                    : 231
% 0.12/0.47  % ...of these trivial                  : 6
% 0.12/0.47  % ...subsumed                          : 72
% 0.12/0.47  % ...remaining for further processing  : 153
% 0.12/0.47  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Generated clauses                    : 1717
% 0.12/0.47  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1652
% 0.12/0.47  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Paramodulations                      : 1717
% 0.12/0.47  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Total rewrite steps                  : 70
% 0.12/0.47  % ...of those cached                   : 32
% 0.12/0.47  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.12/0.47  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.12/0.47  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.47  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.47  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.47  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.12/0.47  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.12/0.47  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.12/0.47  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.12/0.47  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.12/0.47  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.12/0.47  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.12/0.47  % Current number of processed clauses  : 143
% 0.12/0.47  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 28
% 0.12/0.47  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.47  %    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.12/0.47  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 110
% 0.12/0.47  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1434
% 0.12/0.47  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2411
% 0.12/0.47  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Current number of archived clauses   : 10
% 0.12/0.47  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2960
% 0.12/0.47  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2936
% 0.12/0.47  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 72
% 0.12/0.47  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.12/0.47  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 92
% 0.12/0.47  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/0.47  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 31991
% 0.12/0.47  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 20
% 0.12/0.47  
% 0.12/0.47  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.47  % User time                : 0.033 s
% 0.12/0.47  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.47  % Total time               : 0.039 s
% 0.12/0.47  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.12/0.47  
% 0.12/0.47  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.47  % User time                : 0.142 s
% 0.12/0.47  % System time              : 0.032 s
% 0.12/0.47  % Total time               : 0.174 s
% 0.12/0.47  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.12/0.47  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------