↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV263-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.69s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (  10   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   0 sgn  13   !;   0   ?;   7   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f126,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,X3,X2)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X3,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).

fof(f1451,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).

fof(f1453,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_G,v_H,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f1454,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f1455,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

tcf(c_1429,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_G,v_H,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1453]) ).

tcf(c_1430,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1454]) ).

tcf(c_1431,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1455]) ).

tcf(c_1436,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X3,X1,X2)
      | ~ c_in(X3,X0,X2)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tcf(c_1443,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1451]) ).

tcf(c_4819,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1443,c_1431]) ).

tcf(c_5066,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1429,c_1436]) ).

tcf(c_5108,plain,
    c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1430,c_5066]) ).

tcf(c_5109,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5108,c_4819]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV263-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.57  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.57  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.57  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.57  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.57  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.57  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.57  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.57  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:58:05 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.57  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.57  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.61  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.61  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.62  
% 0.09/0.62  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.62  
% 0.09/0.62  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.63  % Proving...
% 2.69/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.69/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.69/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.69/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 26 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.69/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 2.69/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % 
% 2.69/1.28  % clauses                               35
% 2.69/1.28  % conjectures                           3
% 2.69/1.28  % EPR                                   10
% 2.69/1.28  % Horn                                  32
% 2.69/1.28  % unary                                 16
% 2.69/1.28  % binary                                15
% 2.69/1.28  % lits                                  58
% 2.69/1.28  % lits eq                               14
% 2.69/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.69/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.69/1.28  % fd_cond                               2
% 2.69/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        7
% 2.69/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % ------ 
% 2.69/1.28  % Current options:
% 2.69/1.28  % ------ 
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % 
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 2.69/1.28  % 
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.69/1.28  
% 2.69/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------