%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV263-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:51 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.58s 11.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 12 unt; 1 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 12 ~; 9 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 sgn 15 !; 0 ?; 9 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_G,v_H,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,X3,X2)
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,X3,tc_set(X2))
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).
tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_G,v_H,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tcf(c_57,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tcf(c_58,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_in(X3,X1,X2)
| ~ c_in(X3,X0,X2)
| ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
tcf(c_76,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_in(X0,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_58]) ).
tcf(c_98,definition,
iPr_def_10 = c_Message_Oparts(v_H),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_99,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_in(X0,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).
tcf(c_100,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,iPr_def_10,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_98]) ).
tcf(c_101,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,v_G,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55]) ).
tcf(c_186,plain,
c_in(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_99]) ).
tcf(c_191,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_in(X0,iPr_def_10,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_57]) ).
tcf(c_199,plain,
c_in(v_X,iPr_def_10,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_186,c_191]) ).
tcf(c_200,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_199,c_100]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV263-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/10.62 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/10.62 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/10.62 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/10.62 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/10.62 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/10.62 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/10.62 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/10.62 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:57:22 UTC 2026
% 0.15/10.62 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/10.62 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/10.66 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/10.66 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/10.67
% 0.15/10.67 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/10.67
% 0.15/10.67 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/10.68 % Proving...
% 1.58/11.53 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.58/11.53 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.58/11.53 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.58/11.53 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.58/11.53 % ------ Proving...
% 1.58/11.53 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 %
% 1.58/11.53 % clauses 5
% 1.58/11.53 % conjectures 2
% 1.58/11.53 % EPR 3
% 1.58/11.53 % Horn 5
% 1.58/11.53 % unary 3
% 1.58/11.53 % binary 2
% 1.58/11.53 % lits 7
% 1.58/11.53 % lits eq 1
% 1.58/11.53 % fd_pure 0
% 1.58/11.53 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.58/11.53 % fd_cond 0
% 1.58/11.53 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.58/11.53 % AC symbols 0
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 % ------
% 1.58/11.53 % Current options:
% 1.58/11.53 % ------
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 %
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 % ------ Proving...
% 1.58/11.53 %
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.58/11.53
% 1.58/11.53
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------