%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV264-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:08 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OFst_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OFst_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OFst_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV264-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:41:37 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % new_bool_1 with pid 2045830 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.17/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.17/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.48 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.48 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2045834 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.17/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.17/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.48 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.48 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.48
% 0.17/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.17/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 1381
% 0.17/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 992
% 0.17/0.48 % Initial clauses : 389
% 0.17/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 389
% 0.17/0.48 % Processed clauses : 460
% 0.17/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % ...subsumed : 72
% 0.17/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 388
% 0.17/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.17/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.17/0.48 % Generated clauses : 139
% 0.17/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 86
% 0.17/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Paramodulations : 135
% 0.17/0.48 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.17/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 48
% 0.17/0.48 % ...of those cached : 26
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 384
% 0.17/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 42
% 0.17/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.17/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 336
% 0.17/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 0.17/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 28
% 0.17/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.17/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 25247
% 0.17/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24860
% 0.17/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 72
% 0.17/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 180
% 0.17/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.17/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.17/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 15459
% 0.17/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2529
% 0.17/0.48
% 0.17/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.48 % User time : 0.021 s
% 0.17/0.48 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.17/0.48 % Total time : 0.028 s
% 0.17/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4872 pages
% 0.17/0.48
% 0.17/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.48 % User time : 0.047 s
% 0.17/0.48 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.17/0.48 % Total time : 0.059 s
% 0.17/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.17/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------