%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SWV267-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:06:37 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.08s 0.23s
% Output : Proof 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV267-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.16 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.16 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.16 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.16 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.16 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.16 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.16 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.16 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 10:23:56 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.16 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.16 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.23 Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.08/0.23
% 0.08/0.23 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.08/0.23
% 0.08/0.23 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.08/0.23 Axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.08/0.23 Axiom 2 (cls_Message_Oparts__increasing_0): c_lessequals(X, c_Message_Oparts(X), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) = true.
% 0.08/0.23 Axiom 3 (cls_conjecture_0): c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_G), c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) = true.
% 0.08/0.23 Axiom 4 (cls_Set_Osubset__trans_0): ifeq(c_lessequals(X, Y, tc_set(Z)), true, ifeq(c_lessequals(Y, W, tc_set(Z)), true, c_lessequals(X, W, tc_set(Z)), true), true) = true.
% 0.08/0.23
% 0.08/0.23 Goal 1 (cls_conjecture_1): c_lessequals(v_G, c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) = true.
% 0.08/0.23 Proof:
% 0.08/0.23 c_lessequals(v_G, c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
% 0.08/0.23 = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.08/0.23 ifeq(true, true, c_lessequals(v_G, c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), true)
% 0.08/0.23 = { by axiom 3 (cls_conjecture_0) R->L }
% 0.08/0.23 ifeq(c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_G), c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), true, c_lessequals(v_G, c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), true)
% 0.08/0.23 = { by axiom 1 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.08/0.23 ifeq(true, true, ifeq(c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_G), c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), true, c_lessequals(v_G, c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), true), true)
% 0.08/0.23 = { by axiom 2 (cls_Message_Oparts__increasing_0) R->L }
% 0.08/0.23 ifeq(c_lessequals(v_G, c_Message_Oparts(v_G), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), true, ifeq(c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_G), c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), true, c_lessequals(v_G, c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), true), true)
% 0.08/0.23 = { by axiom 4 (cls_Set_Osubset__trans_0) }
% 0.08/0.23 true
% 0.08/0.23 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.08/0.23
% 0.08/0.23 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------