↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SWV267-2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.vhyYAgDhLl true

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 05:00:35 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.48s 0.68s
% Output   : Refutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SWV267-2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.vhyYAgDhLl true
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 12:39:08 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.46/0.58  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.46/0.58  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.46/0.58  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.48/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.48/0.68  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.48/0.68  % BCE start: 4
% 0.48/0.68  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.48/0.68  % PE start: 4
% 0.48/0.68  logic: neq
% 0.48/0.68  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.48/0.68  % done 4 iterations in 0.007s
% 0.48/0.68  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.48/0.68  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.48/0.68  thf(c_lessequals_type, type, c_lessequals: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(v_H_type, type, v_H: $i).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(tc_Message_Omsg_type, type, tc_Message_Omsg: $i).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(v_G_type, type, v_G: $i).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(c_Message_Oparts_type, type, c_Message_Oparts: $i > $i).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(tc_set_type, type, tc_set: $i > $i).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(cls_conjecture_0, conjecture,
% 0.48/0.68    (~( c_lessequals @
% 0.48/0.68        ( c_Message_Oparts @ v_G ) @ ( c_Message_Oparts @ v_H ) @ 
% 0.48/0.68        ( tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg ) ))).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.48/0.68    (c_lessequals @
% 0.48/0.68     ( c_Message_Oparts @ v_G ) @ ( c_Message_Oparts @ v_H ) @ 
% 0.48/0.68     ( tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg )),
% 0.48/0.68    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_0])).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.48/0.68      ( (c_lessequals @ (c_Message_Oparts @ v_G) @ (c_Message_Oparts @ v_H) @ 
% 0.48/0.68         (tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg))),
% 0.48/0.68      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(cls_Set_Osubset__trans_0, axiom,
% 0.48/0.68    (( ~( c_lessequals @ V_B @ V_C @ ( tc_set @ T_a ) ) ) | 
% 0.48/0.68     ( ~( c_lessequals @ V_A @ V_B @ ( tc_set @ T_a ) ) ) | 
% 0.48/0.68     ( c_lessequals @ V_A @ V_C @ ( tc_set @ T_a ) ))).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.48/0.68      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.68         (~ (c_lessequals @ X0 @ X1 @ (tc_set @ X2))
% 0.48/0.68          | ~ (c_lessequals @ X3 @ X0 @ (tc_set @ X2))
% 0.48/0.68          |  (c_lessequals @ X3 @ X1 @ (tc_set @ X2)))),
% 0.48/0.68      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_Set_Osubset__trans_0])).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.48/0.68      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.68         (~ (c_lessequals @ X0 @ (c_Message_Oparts @ v_G) @ 
% 0.48/0.68             (tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg))
% 0.48/0.68          |  (c_lessequals @ X0 @ (c_Message_Oparts @ v_H) @ 
% 0.48/0.68              (tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg)))),
% 0.48/0.68      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(cls_conjecture_1, conjecture,
% 0.48/0.68    (c_lessequals @
% 0.48/0.68     v_G @ ( c_Message_Oparts @ v_H ) @ ( tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg ))).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
% 0.48/0.68    (~( c_lessequals @
% 0.48/0.68        v_G @ ( c_Message_Oparts @ v_H ) @ ( tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg ) )),
% 0.48/0.68    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_1])).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.48/0.68      (~ (c_lessequals @ v_G @ (c_Message_Oparts @ v_H) @ 
% 0.48/0.68          (tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg))),
% 0.48/0.68      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.48/0.68      (~ (c_lessequals @ v_G @ (c_Message_Oparts @ v_G) @ 
% 0.48/0.68          (tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg))),
% 0.48/0.68      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(cls_Message_Oparts__increasing_0, axiom,
% 0.48/0.68    (c_lessequals @
% 0.48/0.68     V_H @ ( c_Message_Oparts @ V_H ) @ ( tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg ))).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.48/0.68      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.68          (c_lessequals @ X0 @ (c_Message_Oparts @ X0) @ 
% 0.48/0.68           (tc_set @ tc_Message_Omsg))),
% 0.48/0.68      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_Message_Oparts__increasing_0])).
% 0.48/0.68  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain, ($false),
% 0.48/0.68      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.48/0.68  
% 0.48/0.68  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.48/0.68  
% 0.48/0.68  
% 0.48/0.68  % Terminating...
% 0.53/0.80  % Runner terminated.
% 0.53/0.81  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------