%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : lazyCoP---0.1 % Problem : SWV268-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Wed Jul 20 19:46:07 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 9.79s 1.98s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SWV268-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.12/0.12 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 18:56:04 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 9.79/1.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable % 9.79/1.98 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof % 9.79/1.98 cnf(c0, axiom, % 9.79/1.98 c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(c1, plain, % 9.79/1.98 c_lessequals(v_G,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), % 9.79/1.98 inference(start, [], [c0])). % 9.79/1.98 % 9.79/1.98 cnf(c2, axiom, % 9.79/1.98 c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) | ~c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(a0, assumption, % 9.79/1.98 v_G = X0). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(a1, assumption, % 9.79/1.98 c_Message_Oparts(v_H) = X1). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(a2, assumption, % 9.79/1.98 tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg) = tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(c3, plain, % 9.79/1.98 $false, % 9.79/1.98 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1, a2])], [c1, c2])). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(c4, plain, % 9.79/1.98 c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), % 9.79/1.98 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1, a2])], [c1, c2])). % 9.79/1.98 % 9.79/1.98 cnf(c5, axiom, % 9.79/1.98 c_Message_Oparts(X2) = c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oparts(X2))). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(a3, assumption, % 9.79/1.98 c_Message_Oparts(X1) = c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oparts(X2))). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(c6, plain, % 9.79/1.98 $false, % 9.79/1.98 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c5])). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(c7, plain, % 9.79/1.98 $false, % 9.79/1.98 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c5])). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(c8, plain, % 9.79/1.98 X3 != c_Message_Oparts(X2) | c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),X3,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), % 9.79/1.98 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c5])). % 9.79/1.98 % 9.79/1.98 cnf(a4, assumption, % 9.79/1.98 X3 = c_Message_Oparts(X2)). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(c9, plain, % 9.79/1.98 c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X0),X3,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)), % 9.79/1.98 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a4])], [c8])). % 9.79/1.98 % 9.79/1.98 cnf(c10, axiom, % 9.79/1.98 ~c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(v_G),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(a5, assumption, % 9.79/1.98 c_Message_Oparts(X0) = c_Message_Oparts(v_G)). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(a6, assumption, % 9.79/1.98 X3 = c_Message_Oparts(v_H)). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(a7, assumption, % 9.79/1.98 tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg) = tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(c11, plain, % 9.79/1.98 $false, % 9.79/1.98 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a5, a6, a7])], [c9, c10])). % 9.79/1.98 cnf(c12, plain, % 9.79/1.98 $false, % 9.79/1.98 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a5, a6, a7])], [c9, c10])). % 9.79/1.98 % 9.79/1.98 cnf(c13, plain, % 9.79/1.98 $false, % 9.79/1.98 inference(constraint_solving, [ % 9.79/1.98 bind(X0, v_G), % 9.79/1.98 bind(X1, c_Message_Oparts(v_H)), % 9.79/1.98 bind(X2, v_H), % 9.79/1.98 bind(X3, c_Message_Oparts(X2)) % 9.79/1.98 ], % 9.79/1.98 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7])). % 9.79/1.98 % 9.79/1.98 % SZS output end IncompleteProof %------------------------------------------------------------------------------