%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV269-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:09 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUn__iff_2,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__iff_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUn__iff_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_union(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV269-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.38 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:37:40 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.55 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.18/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.55 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.55 % new_bool_1 with pid 498291 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.18/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.55 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.18/0.55 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.55 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.55 % Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.55 % SubtermCWHack with pid 498293 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.18/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.55 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.18/0.55 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.55 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.55 % Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.55 % Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.18/0.55
% 0.18/0.55 % Proof found!
% 0.18/0.55 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.55 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.55 % Parsed axioms : 2827
% 0.18/0.55 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2392
% 0.18/0.55 % Initial clauses : 435
% 0.18/0.55 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Initial clauses in saturation : 435
% 0.18/0.55 % Processed clauses : 534
% 0.18/0.55 % ...of these trivial : 9
% 0.18/0.55 % ...subsumed : 277
% 0.18/0.55 % ...remaining for further processing : 248
% 0.18/0.55 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 0.18/0.55 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.18/0.55 % Backward-rewritten : 10
% 0.18/0.55 % Generated clauses : 605
% 0.18/0.55 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 421
% 0.18/0.55 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Paramodulations : 590
% 0.18/0.55 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Equation resolutions : 15
% 0.18/0.55 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Total rewrite steps : 216
% 0.18/0.55 % ...of those cached : 126
% 0.18/0.55 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.55 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.55 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.55 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.55 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.55 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.55 % Current number of processed clauses : 234
% 0.18/0.55 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 71
% 0.18/0.55 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Negative unit clauses : 61
% 0.18/0.55 % Non-unit-clauses : 102
% 0.18/0.55 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 321
% 0.18/0.55 % ...number of literals in the above : 1022
% 0.18/0.55 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 0.18/0.55 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1894
% 0.18/0.55 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1358
% 0.18/0.55 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 47
% 0.18/0.55 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 748
% 0.18/0.55 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % BW rewrite match attempts : 46
% 0.18/0.55 % BW rewrite match successes : 10
% 0.18/0.55 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.55 % Termbank termtop insertions : 39855
% 0.18/0.55 % Search garbage collected termcells : 7553
% 0.18/0.55
% 0.18/0.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.55 % User time : 0.033 s
% 0.18/0.55 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.18/0.55 % Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.18/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 6228 pages
% 0.18/0.55
% 0.18/0.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.55 % User time : 0.085 s
% 0.18/0.55 % System time : 0.014 s
% 0.18/0.55 % Total time : 0.099 s
% 0.18/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 0.18/0.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------