↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SWV269-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:58:39 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.51s 16.07s
% Output   : Refutation 1.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    9 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (   4   ~;   2   |;   0   &;  42   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0   ^;   8   !;   0   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(c_in_decl,type,
    c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(v_X_decl,type,
    v_X: $i ).

thf(c_Message_Osynth_decl,type,
    c_Message_Osynth: $i > $i ).

thf(v_H_decl,type,
    v_H: $i ).

thf(tc_Message_Omsg_decl,type,
    tc_Message_Omsg: $i ).

thf(c_union_decl,type,
    c_union: $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(c_Message_Oparts_decl,type,
    c_Message_Oparts: $i > $i ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( v_X @ c_in ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

thf(4,plain,
    tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( v_X @ c_in ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( v_H @ c_Message_Oparts @ c_union ) ) @ ( v_X @ c_in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( v_H @ c_Message_Oparts @ c_union ) ) @ ( v_X @ c_in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( C @ ( B @ ( D @ c_union ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__iff_2) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( C @ ( B @ ( D @ c_union ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[4,5,7]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SWV269-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/5.38   % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.38   % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.38   % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.38   % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.38   % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/15.24  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/15.24  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/15.24  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:25:22 UTC 2026
% 0.04/15.24  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/15.24  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.16/15.51  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 0.16/15.59  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (80ms). 
% 0.16/15.60  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 0.16/15.77  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 0.16/15.77  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 0.16/15.81  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 1 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 0.16/15.83  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 1 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 0.16/15.83  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 0.16/15.83  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 0.16/15.83  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 1.51/16.07  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 1.51/16.07  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 1.51/16.07  % Time passed: 761ms (effective reasoning time: 474ms)
% 1.51/16.07  % Axioms used in derivation (1): cls_Set_OUn__iff_2
% 1.51/16.07  % No. of inferences in proof: 7
% 1.51/16.07  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 761 ms resp. 474 ms w/o parsing
% 1.51/16.09  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.51/16.09  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------