%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV271-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:53 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 20.90s 9.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 20.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 63 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 51 ( 24 ~; 27 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 58 ( 0 sgn 58 !; 0 ?; 31 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3190,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,X1,X3)
| c_in(X0,X2,X3)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__iff_0) ).
fof(f3191,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X3,X2),X2)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__iff_1) ).
fof(f3192,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_union(X3,X1,X2),X2)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__iff_2) ).
fof(f3310,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).
fof(f3366,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-0.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).
fof(f3380,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-1.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__analz_0) ).
fof(f3382,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-1.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__synth_0) ).
fof(f3388,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-1.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz_OInj_0) ).
fof(f3407,axiom,
! [X0] : c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(X0)) = c_Message_Oparts(X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-1.ax',cls_Message_Oparts__analz_0) ).
fof(f3408,plain,
! [X0] : c_Message_Oparts(X0) = c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(X0)),
inference(reorient_equations,[],[f3407]) ).
fof(f3434,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f3435,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_Y,c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
tcf(c_2878,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3434]) ).
tcf(c_2879,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_Y,c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3435]) ).
tcf(c_2884,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3382]) ).
tcf(c_2886,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3380]) ).
tcf(c_2892,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3310]) ).
tcf(c_2899,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Oanalz(X0)) = c_Message_Oparts(X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3408]) ).
tcf(c_2905,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3366]) ).
tcf(c_2917,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_union(X3,X1,X2),X2)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3192]) ).
tcf(c_2918,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X3,X2),X2)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3191]) ).
tcf(c_2919,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( c_in(X0,X2,X3)
| c_in(X0,X1,X3)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_union(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3190]) ).
tcf(c_2963,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3388]) ).
tcf(c_34680,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2899,c_2905]) ).
tcf(c_35319,plain,
~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2917,c_2879]) ).
tcf(c_35338,plain,
~ c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2918,c_2879]) ).
tcf(c_37621,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2963,c_2886]) ).
tcf(c_39394,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_2919]) ).
tcf(c_49113,plain,
( c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_2892]) ).
tcf(c_51610,plain,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2878,c_2919]) ).
tcf(c_51668,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_51610,c_2878,c_35338,c_39394,c_49113]) ).
tcf(c_60220,plain,
( c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51668,c_2884]) ).
tcf(c_60224,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_60220,c_35319]) ).
tcf(c_60226,plain,
c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_60224,c_37621]) ).
tcf(c_60229,plain,
c_in(v_Y,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_60226,c_34680]) ).
tcf(c_60230,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_60229,c_35338]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV271-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/5.37 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/5.37 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:58:12 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/5.37 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/5.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/5.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/5.42
% 0.13/5.42 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/5.42
% 0.13/5.42 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/5.43 % Proving...
% 20.90/9.74 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 20.90/9.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 % ------ iProver source info
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 20.90/9.74 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 20.90/9.74 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 40 sf_s rm: 5 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe_e sup_sim: 16 sf_s rm: 16 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 16 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 20.90/9.74 % ------ Proving...
% 20.90/9.74 % ------ Problem Properties
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 %
% 20.90/9.74 % clauses 576
% 20.90/9.74 % conjectures 3
% 20.90/9.74 % EPR 23
% 20.90/9.74 % Horn 509
% 20.90/9.74 % unary 232
% 20.90/9.74 % binary 255
% 20.90/9.74 % lits 1011
% 20.90/9.74 % lits eq 429
% 20.90/9.74 % fd_pure 0
% 20.90/9.74 % fd_pseudo 0
% 20.90/9.74 % fd_cond 37
% 20.90/9.74 % fd_pseudo_cond 40
% 20.90/9.74 % AC symbols 0
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 % ------
% 20.90/9.74 % Current options:
% 20.90/9.74 % ------
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 %
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 % ------ Proving...
% 20.90/9.74 %
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 20.90/9.74
% 20.90/9.74 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 20.90/9.75
% 20.90/9.75
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------