%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SWV273-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:44:35 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.76s 0.93s
% Output : Refutation 0.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_union(c_Message_Oparts(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(v_H)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X3,X3,tc_set(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X10),c_Message_Oparts(X11),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(X10,c_Message_Oparts(X11),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_0) ).
cnf(c4,plain,
c_lessequals(X12,c_Message_Oparts(X12),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts__subset__iff_0,cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0]) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Osynth__increasing_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X4,c_Message_Osynth(X4),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Osynth__increasing_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(X5,X6,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X5),c_Message_Oparts(X6),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0) ).
cnf(c1,plain,
c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(X8),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(X8)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts__mono_0,cls_Message_Osynth__increasing_0]) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUn__subset__iff_2,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(X15,X17,tc_set(X16))
| ~ c_lessequals(X18,X17,tc_set(X16))
| c_lessequals(c_union(X18,X15,X16),X17,tc_set(X16)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OUn__subset__iff_2) ).
cnf(c16,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X57,c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(X58)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(c_union(c_Message_Oparts(X58),X57,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(X58)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUn__subset__iff_2,c1]) ).
cnf(c159,plain,
c_lessequals(c_union(c_Message_Oparts(X150),c_Message_Osynth(X150),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Oparts(c_Message_Osynth(X150)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c16,c4]) ).
cnf(c796,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c159,cls_conjecture_0]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWV273-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 9 06:42:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.76/0.93 % Version: 1.5
% 0.76/0.93 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.93 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.76/0.93
% 0.76/0.93 % Initial clauses : 6
% 0.76/0.93 % Processed clauses : 93
% 0.76/0.93 % Factors computed : 1
% 0.76/0.93 % Resolvents computed: 801
% 0.76/0.93 % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.76/0.93 % Forward subsumed : 28
% 0.76/0.93 % Backward subsumed : 0
% 0.76/0.93 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.76/0.93 % User time : 0.555 s
% 0.76/0.93 % System time : 0.021 s
% 0.76/0.93 % Total time : 0.576 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------