%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SWV274-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:58:40 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 5.17s 8.23s
% Output : Refutation 5.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 7 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 2 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 154 ( 12 ~; 14 |; 0 &; 128 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 8 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 12 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 ^; 30 !; 0 ?; 30 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(c_in_decl,type,
c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(v_Y_decl,type,
v_Y: $i ).
thf(c_Message_Osynth_decl,type,
c_Message_Osynth: $i > $i ).
thf(c_insert_decl,type,
c_insert: $i > $i > $i > $i ).
thf(v_X_decl,type,
v_X: $i ).
thf(v_H_decl,type,
v_H: $i ).
thf(tc_Message_Omsg_decl,type,
tc_Message_Omsg: $i ).
thf(c_lessequals_decl,type,
c_lessequals: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(tc_set_decl,type,
tc_set: $i > $i ).
thf(c_Main_OsubsetI__1_decl,type,
c_Main_OsubsetI__1: $i > $i > $i > $i ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( v_X @ c_in ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
thf(10,plain,
tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( v_X @ c_in ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ tc_set @ ( B @ ( A @ c_lessequals ) ) )
| ( C @ ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Main_OsubsetI__1 ) ) @ c_in ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).
thf(20,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ tc_set @ ( B @ ( A @ c_lessequals ) ) )
| ( C @ ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Main_OsubsetI__1 ) ) @ c_in ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(1,negated_conjecture,
tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ ( v_X @ c_insert ) ) @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( v_Y @ c_in ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
thf(9,plain,
tc_Message_Omsg @ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ ( v_X @ c_insert ) ) @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( v_Y @ c_in ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
| ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Osynth_OInj_0) ).
thf(13,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
| ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( A = B )
| ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
| ~ ( D @ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ c_insert ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OinsertE_0) ).
thf(17,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( A = B )
| ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
| ~ ( D @ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ c_insert ) ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ tc_set @ ( B @ ( A @ c_lessequals ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Main_OsubsetI__1 ) ) @ c_in ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).
thf(22,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ tc_set @ ( B @ ( A @ c_lessequals ) ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Main_OsubsetI__1 ) ) @ c_in ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( v_Y @ c_in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
thf(11,plain,
~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_H @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( v_Y @ c_in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
| ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ tc_set @ ( C @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( B @ c_lessequals ) ) )
| ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Osynth__trans_0) ).
thf(15,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
| ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ tc_set @ ( C @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( B @ c_lessequals ) ) )
| ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ c_Message_Osynth @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(24,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,20,9,13,17,22,11,15]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV274-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.22/5.49 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.22/5.49 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.22/5.49 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.22/5.49 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.22/5.49 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.22/5.49 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.22/5.49 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.22/5.49 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:26:53 UTC 2026
% 0.22/5.49 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/5.49 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.39/6.35 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.91/6.62 % [INFO] Parsing done (270ms).
% 1.91/6.64 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.87/7.27 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.87/7.28 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 3.25/7.41 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 5 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 3.25/7.46 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 5 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 3.25/7.48 % [INFO] Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF).
% 3.25/7.49 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 3.42/7.50 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 5.17/8.22 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 5.17/8.23 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 5.17/8.23 % Time passed: 2521ms (effective reasoning time: 1573ms)
% 5.17/8.23 % Axioms used in derivation (5): cls_Set_OsubsetI_1, cls_Set_OsubsetI_0, cls_Set_OinsertE_0, cls_Message_Osynth__trans_0, cls_Message_Osynth_OInj_0
% 5.17/8.23 % No. of inferences in proof: 17
% 5.17/8.23 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2521 ms resp. 1573 ms w/o parsing
% 5.17/8.30 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.17/8.30 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------