↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWV275-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:37:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.21s 4.45s
% Output   : Refutation 4.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWV275-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 00:48:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37  Wed Jun 15 00:48:52 2022
% 0.13/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 20128.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [copy,10,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.41  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.41  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.41  number of clauses in intial UL: 7
% 0.13/0.41  number of clauses initially in problem: 10
% 0.13/0.41  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 70
% 0.13/0.41  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.41  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.41  absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.13/0.41     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.13/0.41     distinct function count: 4
% 0.13/0.41     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.14/2.39  
% 2.14/2.39  
% 2.14/2.39  Changing weight limit from 60 to 59.
% 2.14/2.39  
% 2.14/2.39  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.14/2.39  
% 2.14/2.39  Resetting weight limit to 59 after 200 givens.
% 2.14/2.39  
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 4.21/4.45  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.21/4.45  % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   4.04 sec ----> 6543 [binary,6542.1,7.1] {-} $F.
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  Length of proof is 12.  Level of proof is 10.
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 4.21/4.45  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.21/4.45  % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  1 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Osynth(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 4.21/4.45  2 [] {+} -c_lessequals(A,B,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))|c_lessequals(c_Message_Osynth(A),c_Message_Osynth(B),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 4.21/4.45  3 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,C)|c_in(A,c_insert(D,B,C),C).
% 4.21/4.45  4 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_insert(B,C,D),D)|c_in(A,C,D)|A=B.
% 4.21/4.45  5 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,C)| -c_lessequals(B,D,tc_set(C))|c_in(A,D,C).
% 4.21/4.45  6 [] {+} -c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(A,B,C),B,C)|c_lessequals(A,B,tc_set(C)).
% 4.21/4.45  7 [] {+} -c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 4.21/4.45  8 [] {+} c_in(A,c_insert(A,B,C),C).
% 4.21/4.45  9 [] {-} c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(A,B,C),A,C)|c_lessequals(A,B,tc_set(C)).
% 4.21/4.45  12 [hyper,8,1] {+} c_in(A,c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 4.21/4.45  14 [hyper,9,7] {-} c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),c_insert(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 4.21/4.45  16 [hyper,9,2] {-} c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg),A,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_lessequals(c_Message_Osynth(A),c_Message_Osynth(B),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 4.21/4.45  55 [hyper,14,4] {-} c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)=v_X.
% 4.21/4.45  4115 [para_from,55.2.1,6.1.1,unit_del,12,7] {-} c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 4.21/4.45  4116 [hyper,4115,5,16] {-} c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(A),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_H,A,tc_Message_Omsg),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg).
% 4.21/4.45  4869 [hyper,4116,6,unit_del,7] {-} c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_H,c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),v_H,tc_Message_Omsg).
% 4.21/4.45  4904 [hyper,4869,3] {-} c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_H,c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),c_insert(A,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 4.21/4.45  4961 [hyper,4904,6] {-} c_lessequals(v_H,c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 4.21/4.45  4976 [hyper,4961,2] {-} c_lessequals(c_Message_Osynth(v_H),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 4.21/4.45  4985 [hyper,4976,5,4115] {-} c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 4.21/4.45  6542 [hyper,4985,6] {-} c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)).
% 4.21/4.45  6543 [binary,6542.1,7.1] {-} $F.
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  % SZS output end Refutation
% 4.21/4.45  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  ============ end of search ============
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  true clauses given          83      (28.2%)
% 4.21/4.45  false clauses given        211
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45        FALSE     TRUE
% 4.21/4.45    16  0         5
% 4.21/4.45    17  0         23
% 4.21/4.45    18  0         14
% 4.21/4.45    19  22        20
% 4.21/4.45    20  17        8
% 4.21/4.45    21  29        15
% 4.21/4.45    22  15        18
% 4.21/4.45    23  23        26
% 4.21/4.45    24  26        35
% 4.21/4.45    25  40        69
% 4.21/4.45    26  45        95
% 4.21/4.45    27  60        118
% 4.21/4.45    28  84        87
% 4.21/4.45    29  114       141
% 4.21/4.45    30  132       137
% 4.21/4.45    31  118       98
% 4.21/4.45    32  127       69
% 4.21/4.45    33  113       139
% 4.21/4.45    34  105       90
% 4.21/4.45    35  105       128
% 4.21/4.45    36  112       95
% 4.21/4.45    37  136       118
% 4.21/4.45    38  157       154
% 4.21/4.45    39  207       198
% 4.21/4.45    40  307       259
% 4.21/4.45    41  185       67
% 4.21/4.45    42  153       49
% 4.21/4.45    43  81        45
% 4.21/4.45    44  0         31
% 4.21/4.45    45  0         27
% 4.21/4.45    46  0         23
% 4.21/4.45    47  0         8
% 4.21/4.45    48  0         7
% 4.21/4.45    49  0         7
% 4.21/4.45    50  0         6
% 4.21/4.45    51  0         3
% 4.21/4.45    52  0         3
% 4.21/4.45    53  0         2
% 4.21/4.45    54  0         3
% 4.21/4.45    55  0         3
% 4.21/4.45    56  0         4
% 4.21/4.45    57  0         2
% 4.21/4.45    58  0         3
% 4.21/4.45    59  0         2
% 4.21/4.45  tot:  2513      2454      (49.4% true)
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 4.21/4.45  
% 4.21/4.45  Process 20128 finished Wed Jun 15 00:48:56 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------