↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV275-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:54 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.02s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   61 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   56 (  25   ~;  31   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   73 (   0 sgn  73   !;   0   ?;  48   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Osynth_OInj_0) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Osynth(X0),c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Osynth__mono_0) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_insert(X3,X1,X2),X2)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OinsertCI_0) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : c_in(X0,c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OinsertCI_1) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | c_in(X0,X2,X3)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OinsertE_0) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,X3,X2)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X3,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).

fof(f9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_Message_Osynth(X0),c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_insert(X3,X1,X2),X2)
      | ~ c_in(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_in(X0,c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,X2,X3)
      | ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X3,X1,X2)
      | ~ c_in(X3,X0,X2)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_294,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_301,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X3,tc_set(X2))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X3,X2),X1,X2)
      | ( c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(X0,X1,X2),X3,X2) = X0 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_309,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),X1,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_310,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),tc_set(X3))
      | ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3),X2,X3) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_338,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_insert(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X0),tc_Message_Omsg),X3,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X0),tc_Message_Omsg),X3,tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ( c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X0),tc_Message_Omsg),X3,tc_Message_Omsg) = X2 )
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_301,c_294]) ).

tcf(c_404,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_lessequals(X0,c_insert(X1,X0,X2),tc_set(X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_310]) ).

tcf(c_460,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_insert(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X0),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
      | ( c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(X2,c_Message_Osynth(X0),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) = X2 )
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_338,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_1866,plain,
    ( ( c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) = v_X )
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_H,c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_460,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_1937,plain,
    c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_insert(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) = v_X,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_404,c_1866]) ).

tcf(c_1943,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(c_insert(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),c_Message_Osynth(c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
    | ~ c_in(v_X,c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1937,c_309]) ).

tcf(c_1948,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_X,c_insert(v_X,v_H,tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_1943,c_66,c_1943]) ).

tcf(c_2007,plain,
    $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_1948]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV275-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:01:40 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.42  % Proving...
% 4.02/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.02/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.02/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.02/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 4.02/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 4.02/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  % 
% 4.02/1.28  % clauses                               9
% 4.02/1.28  % conjectures                           1
% 4.02/1.28  % EPR                                   0
% 4.02/1.28  % Horn                                  7
% 4.02/1.28  % unary                                 2
% 4.02/1.28  % binary                                5
% 4.02/1.28  % lits                                  18
% 4.02/1.28  % lits eq                               1
% 4.02/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.02/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.02/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 4.02/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 4.02/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  % ------ 
% 4.02/1.28  % Current options:
% 4.02/1.28  % ------ 
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  % 
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 4.02/1.28  % 
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.02/1.28  
% 4.02/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------