%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV277-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:12 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.07s 0.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 0 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OkeysFor__mono_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(c_Message_OkeysFor(X1),c_Message_OkeysFor(X2),tc_set(tc_nat)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OkeysFor__mono_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(v_H)),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__parts_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetD_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(c_Message_OkeysFor(X1),c_Message_OkeysFor(X2),tc_set(tc_nat)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OkeysFor__mono_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| c_lessequals(c_Message_OkeysFor(X1),c_Message_OkeysFor(X2),tc_set(tc_nat)) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(v_H)),tc_nat),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X3,X2,tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(X3),tc_nat)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(X2),tc_nat) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
c_lessequals(c_Message_Oanalz(X1),c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
cls_Message_Oanalz__subset__parts_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(v_H)),tc_nat),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oanalz(X2)),tc_nat)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oparts(X2)),tc_nat) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_K,c_Message_OkeysFor(c_Message_Oanalz(v_H)),tc_nat),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : SWV277-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.03/0.30 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.30 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.30 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.03/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:37:38 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.03/0.30 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.33 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.33 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.34 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.07/0.34 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % new_bool_3 with pid 2007717 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.07/0.34 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.07/0.34 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.07/0.34 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2007722 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.07/0.34 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.07/0.34 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.07/0.34 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.34
% 0.07/0.34 % Proof found!
% 0.07/0.34 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.07/0.34 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.34 % Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.07/0.34 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Initial clauses : 5
% 0.07/0.34 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.07/0.34 % Processed clauses : 8
% 0.07/0.34 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.07/0.34 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Generated clauses : 4
% 0.07/0.34 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.07/0.34 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Paramodulations : 4
% 0.07/0.34 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % NegExts : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.07/0.34 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.07/0.34 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.07/0.34 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.07/0.34 % Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.07/0.34 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.07/0.34 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.07/0.34 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.07/0.34 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Termbank termtop insertions : 228
% 0.07/0.34 % Search garbage collected termcells : 11
% 0.07/0.34
% 0.07/0.34 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.34 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.07/0.34 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.34 % Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.07/0.34 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.07/0.34
% 0.07/0.34 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.34 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.07/0.34 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.07/0.34 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.07/0.34 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.07/0.34 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------