%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWV278-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:27 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.68s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.55s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SWV278-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.12/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 20:24:54 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.55/0.68 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.68 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.55/0.68 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.55/0.68 % Transform :cnf % 0.55/0.68 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.55/0.68 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.55/0.68 % 0.55/0.68 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.55/0.68 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.55/0.68 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.68 % File : SWV278-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.55/0.68 % Domain : Software Verification (Security) % 0.55/0.68 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for events % 0.55/0.68 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial. % 0.55/0.68 % English : % 0.55/0.68 % 0.55/0.68 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.55/0.68 % Source : [Pau06] % 0.55/0.68 % Names : % 0.55/0.68 % 0.55/0.68 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.55/0.68 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.08 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.1, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0 % 0.55/0.68 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 4 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR) % 0.55/0.68 % Number of literals : 5 ( 1 equ; 2 neg) % 0.55/0.68 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.55/0.68 % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg) % 0.55/0.68 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty) % 0.55/0.68 % Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty) % 0.55/0.68 % Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn) % 0.55/0.68 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN % 0.55/0.68 % 0.55/0.68 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms, % 0.55/0.68 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation. % 0.55/0.68 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation % 0.55/0.68 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary % 0.55/0.68 % axioms. % 0.55/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.68 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.68 ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ). % 0.55/0.68 % 0.55/0.68 cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.68 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ). % 0.55/0.68 % 0.55/0.68 cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0,axiom, % 0.55/0.68 ( ~ c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oanalz(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) % 0.55/0.68 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.55/0.68 % 0.55/0.68 cnf(cls_Message_OinvKey_A_IinvKey_Ay_J_A_61_61_Ay_0,axiom, % 0.55/0.68 c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(V_y)) = V_y ). % 0.55/0.68 % 0.55/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.68 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.68 % Proof found % 0.55/0.68 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.55/0.68 % SZS output start Proof % 0.55/0.68 %ClaNum:14(EqnAxiom:10) % 0.55/0.68 %VarNum:6(SingletonVarNum:3) % 0.55/0.68 %MaxLitNum:2 % 0.55/0.68 %MaxfuncDepth:3 % 0.55/0.68 %SharedTerms:11 % 0.55/0.68 %goalClause: 12 13 % 0.55/0.68 %singleGoalClaCount:2 % 0.55/0.68 [12]P1(f4(a3),f2(a5),a6) % 0.55/0.68 [13]~P1(f4(f1(f1(a3))),f7(a5),a6) % 0.55/0.68 [11]E(f1(f1(x111)),x111) % 0.55/0.68 [14]~P1(x141,f2(x142),a6)+P1(x141,f7(x142),a6) % 0.55/0.68 %EqnAxiom % 0.55/0.68 [1]E(x11,x11) % 0.55/0.68 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22) % 0.55/0.68 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33) % 0.55/0.68 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f1(x41),f1(x42)) % 0.55/0.68 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f2(x51),f2(x52)) % 0.55/0.68 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f4(x61),f4(x62)) % 0.55/0.68 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f7(x71),f7(x72)) % 0.55/0.68 [8]P1(x82,x83,x84)+~E(x81,x82)+~P1(x81,x83,x84) % 0.55/0.68 [9]P1(x93,x92,x94)+~E(x91,x92)+~P1(x93,x91,x94) % 0.55/0.68 [10]P1(x103,x104,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P1(x103,x104,x101) % 0.55/0.68 % 0.55/0.68 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.69 cnf(17,plain, % 0.55/0.69 (E(x171,f1(f1(x171)))), % 0.55/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[13,11,14,2])). % 0.55/0.69 cnf(20,plain, % 0.55/0.69 (~E(a3,f1(f1(a3)))), % 0.55/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[12,13,11,14,2,8,9,6])). % 0.55/0.69 cnf(23,plain, % 0.55/0.69 ($false), % 0.55/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,20]), % 0.55/0.69 ['proof']). % 0.55/0.69 % SZS output end Proof % 0.55/0.69 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------