%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SWV278-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:06:38 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.08s 0.24s
% Output : Proof 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV278-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.17 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.17 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.17 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.17 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.17 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.17 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.17 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.17 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 10:25:09 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.17 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.17 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.24 Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.08/0.24
% 0.08/0.24 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.08/0.24
% 0.08/0.24 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.08/0.24 Axiom 1 (cls_Message_OinvKey_A_IinvKey_Ay_J_A_61_61_Ay_0): c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X)) = X.
% 0.08/0.24 Axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.08/0.24 Axiom 3 (cls_conjecture_3): c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H), c_Message_Oanalz(v_H), tc_Message_Omsg) = true.
% 0.08/0.24 Axiom 4 (cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0): ifeq(c_in(X, c_Message_Oanalz(Y), tc_Message_Omsg), true, c_in(X, c_Message_Oparts(Y), tc_Message_Omsg), true) = true.
% 0.08/0.24
% 0.08/0.24 Goal 1 (cls_conjecture_1): c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))), c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_Message_Omsg) = true.
% 0.08/0.24 Proof:
% 0.08/0.24 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))), c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.08/0.24 = { by axiom 1 (cls_Message_OinvKey_A_IinvKey_Ay_J_A_61_61_Ay_0) }
% 0.08/0.24 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H), c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_Message_Omsg)
% 0.08/0.24 = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.08/0.24 ifeq(true, true, c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H), c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_Message_Omsg), true)
% 0.08/0.24 = { by axiom 3 (cls_conjecture_3) R->L }
% 0.08/0.24 ifeq(c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H), c_Message_Oanalz(v_H), tc_Message_Omsg), true, c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H), c_Message_Oparts(v_H), tc_Message_Omsg), true)
% 0.08/0.24 = { by axiom 4 (cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0) }
% 0.08/0.24 true
% 0.08/0.24 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.08/0.24
% 0.08/0.25 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------