%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV278-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:55 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 1.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 14 unt; 3 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 5 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 12 ( 8 ~; 4 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 4 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?; 5 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] : c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X0)) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OinvKey_A_IinvKey_Ay_J_A_61_61_Ay_0) ).
tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(v_K_H))),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_55,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oanalz(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tcf(c_56,plain,
! [X0: $i] : c_Message_OinvKey(c_Message_OinvKey(X0)) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tcf(c_69,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_56]) ).
tcf(c_80,definition,
iPr_def_10 = c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K_H),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_81,definition,
iPr_def_11 = c_Message_Oparts(v_H),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_82,definition,
iPr_def_12 = c_Message_Oanalz(v_H),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_83,plain,
~ c_in(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_81,c_80]) ).
tcf(c_84,negated_conjecture,
c_in(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_82]) ).
tcf(c_203,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_55]) ).
tcf(c_204,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_in(X0,iPr_def_11,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_12,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_203,c_81]) ).
tcf(c_212,plain,
c_in(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_204]) ).
tcf(c_213,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_212,c_83]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV278-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.57 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.57 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.57 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.57 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.57 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.57 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.57 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.57 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:02:40 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.57 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.58 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.61 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.62 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.63
% 0.11/0.63 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.63
% 0.11/0.63 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/0.64 % Proving...
% 0.46/1.50 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.50 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 % ------ iProver source info
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.46/1.50 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.46/1.50 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.46/1.50 % ------ Proving...
% 0.46/1.50 % ------ Problem Properties
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 %
% 0.46/1.50 % clauses 7
% 0.46/1.50 % conjectures 1
% 0.46/1.50 % EPR 2
% 0.46/1.50 % Horn 7
% 0.46/1.50 % unary 6
% 0.46/1.50 % binary 1
% 0.46/1.50 % lits 8
% 0.46/1.50 % lits eq 4
% 0.46/1.50 % fd_pure 0
% 0.46/1.50 % fd_pseudo 0
% 0.46/1.50 % fd_cond 0
% 0.46/1.50 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 0.46/1.50 % AC symbols 0
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 % ------
% 0.46/1.50 % Current options:
% 0.46/1.50 % ------
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 %
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 % ------ Proving...
% 0.46/1.50 %
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.46/1.50
% 0.46/1.50
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------