%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV279-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:12 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.27s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 59 ( 0 equ; 31 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 69 ( 16 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).
cnf(cls_Public_Oused__parts__subset__parts_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Public_Oused__parts__subset__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).
cnf(cls_Set_Oinsert__iff_1,axiom,
c_in(X1,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Oinsert__iff_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_X,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_Y,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetD_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Public_Oused__parts__subset__parts_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,X4,X3) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X1,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
c_in(X1,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3),
cls_Set_Oinsert__iff_1 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ c_in(X3,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X3,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X2,X1),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X3),X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_X,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_Y,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X3,X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_X,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_Y,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_Y,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X3),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_X,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_25]),c_0_30]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV279-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.42 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.42 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.42 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.42 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.42 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.42 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:41:05 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.42 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/0.52 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.27/0.52 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.52 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.52 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.52 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.52 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1065972 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.52 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.27/0.52 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.52 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.27/0.52 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.27/0.52 % Search class: FHHNF-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.52 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.27/0.52 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.52 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.52 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.52 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1065978 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.52 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.27/0.52 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.52 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.27/0.52 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.27/0.52 % Search class: FHHNF-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.52 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.27/0.52 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.52 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.27/0.52 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.27/0.52
% 0.27/0.52 % Proof found!
% 0.27/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.27/0.52 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/0.53 % Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.27/0.53 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Initial clauses : 8
% 0.27/0.53 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.27/0.53 % Processed clauses : 40
% 0.27/0.53 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % ...remaining for further processing : 40
% 0.27/0.53 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Generated clauses : 53
% 0.27/0.53 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 52
% 0.27/0.53 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Paramodulations : 53
% 0.27/0.53 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % NegExts : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Current number of processed clauses : 31
% 0.27/0.53 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.27/0.53 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Non-unit-clauses : 17
% 0.27/0.53 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 28
% 0.27/0.53 % ...number of literals in the above : 30
% 0.27/0.53 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.27/0.53 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 58
% 0.27/0.53 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 58
% 0.27/0.53 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.27/0.53 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 0.27/0.53 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1153
% 0.27/0.53 % Search garbage collected termcells : 21
% 0.27/0.53
% 0.27/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.53 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.27/0.53 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.27/0.53 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.27/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.27/0.53
% 0.27/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.53 % User time : 0.021 s
% 0.27/0.53 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.27/0.53 % Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.27/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.27/0.53 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------