%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWV279-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:32:31 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.50s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_Y,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_X,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,Y),c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(Y,c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,Y),c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(Z),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,Y,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(Y),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_Public_Oused__parts__subset__parts_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,c_Event_Oused(Y),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X,c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Event_Oused(Y),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Public_Oused__parts__subset__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_Oinsert__iff_1,axiom,
c_in(X,c_insert(X,Y,Z),Z),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Oinsert__iff_1) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X,Y,Z)
| ~ c_lessequals(Y,U,tc_set(Z))
| c_in(X,U,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).
cnf(10,plain,
c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X,Y,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,cls_Set_Oinsert__iff_1]) ).
cnf(11,plain,
c_lessequals(c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,v_Y),c_emptyset,tc_Message_Omsg)),c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_set(tc_Message_Omsg)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Public_Oused__parts__subset__parts_0,cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(18,plain,
c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X,Y),Z,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,10]) ).
cnf(19,plain,
c_in(X,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(Y,X),Z,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,10]) ).
cnf(30,plain,
c_in(v_X,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,11,18]) ).
cnf(31,plain,
~ c_in(v_Y,c_Event_Oused(v_H),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1,30]) ).
cnf(32,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,11,19]),31]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV279-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 22:21:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 "."
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T22:21:53
% 0.19/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n009.cluster.edu at 2022-06-14T22:21:53
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 #||
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51 ||#
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.19/0.51 ; 65 formulas have been input or derived (from 20 formulas).
% 0.19/0.51 ; 32 (49%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.19/0.51 ; 1 ( 3%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.19/0.51 ; 31 (97%) are still being kept.
% 0.19/0.51 ;
% 0.19/0.51 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.002 6% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Assert (8 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.003 9% Process new row (50 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.003 9% Resolution (38 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (19 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (6 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (6 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (6 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (4 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.002 6% Forward simplification (50 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Backward simplification (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.023 70% Other
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.033 Total
% 0.19/0.51 ; 0.034 Real time
% 0.19/0.51 ;
% 0.19/0.51 ; Term-hash-array has 76 terms in all.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 5 entries (6 at peak, 6 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 26 nodes (37 at peak, 37 added, 11 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 1 possibly forward subsuming row in 6 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 3 possibly backward subsumed rows in 6 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Path-index has 81 entries (81 at peak, 82 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Path-index has 212 nodes (212 at peak, 212 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Trie-index has 81 entries (81 at peak, 82 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Trie-index has 236 nodes (236 at peak, 239 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 44 generalization terms in 53 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 29 instance terms in 25 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ; Retrieved 331 unifiable terms in 208 calls.
% 0.19/0.51 ;
% 0.19/0.51 ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 0.19/0.51 ; 2 with value 10 1 with value 11
% 0.19/0.51 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 1 entry:
% 0.19/0.51 ; 1 with value 7
% 0.19/0.51 ; The agenda of rows to give has 11 entries:
% 0.19/0.51 ; 1 with value (4 10) 2 with value (4 18) 4 with value (4 20)
% 0.19/0.51 ; 2 with value (4 17) 2 with value (4 19)
% 0.19/0.51 Evaluation took:
% 0.19/0.51 0.034 seconds of real time
% 0.19/0.51 0.025697 seconds of user run time
% 0.19/0.51 0.008323 seconds of system run time
% 0.19/0.51 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.19/0.51 0 page faults and
% 0.19/0.51 2,574,896 bytes consed.
% 0.19/0.51 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.51 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T22:21:53
% 0.19/0.51 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.51 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------