%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV280-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:12 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.50s 0.97s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Nat_Ole__add2_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_plus(X2,X1,tc_nat),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Ole__add2_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(v_evs),X1,tc_nat),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_plus(X2,X1,tc_nat),tc_nat),
cls_Nat_Ole__add2_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV280-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:35:36 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.50/0.97 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.50/0.97 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.50/0.97 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.50/0.97 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.50/0.97 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.97 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.97 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.97 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 673073 completed with status 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.50/0.97 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.50/0.97 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.50/0.97 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.50/0.97 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.50/0.97 % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.50/0.97 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.50/0.97 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.50/0.97 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.97 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.97 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.97 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.97 % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.97 % SubtermCWHack with pid 673080 completed with status 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.50/0.97 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.50/0.97 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.50/0.97 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.50/0.97 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.50/0.97 % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.50/0.97 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.50/0.97 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.50/0.97 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.50/0.97 % Preprocessing time : 0.027 s
% 1.50/0.97
% 1.50/0.97 % Proof found!
% 1.50/0.97 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.50/0.97 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.50/0.97 % Parsed axioms : 2938
% 1.50/0.97 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Initial clauses : 2938
% 1.50/0.97 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 1.50/0.97 % Initial clauses in saturation : 2926
% 1.50/0.97 % Processed clauses : 6659
% 1.50/0.97 % ...of these trivial : 49
% 1.50/0.97 % ...subsumed : 4247
% 1.50/0.97 % ...remaining for further processing : 2363
% 1.50/0.97 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 75
% 1.50/0.97 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Backward-subsumed : 42
% 1.50/0.97 % Backward-rewritten : 72
% 1.50/0.97 % Generated clauses : 8629
% 1.50/0.97 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6400
% 1.50/0.97 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 8
% 1.50/0.97 % Paramodulations : 8518
% 1.50/0.97 % Factorizations : 2
% 1.50/0.97 % NegExts : 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Equation resolutions : 109
% 1.50/0.97 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Total rewrite steps : 3586
% 1.50/0.97 % ...of those cached : 3148
% 1.50/0.97 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.50/0.97 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.50/0.97 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.50/0.97 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.50/0.97 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.50/0.97 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.50/0.97 % Current number of processed clauses : 2249
% 1.50/0.97 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 524
% 1.50/0.97 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 1.50/0.97 % Negative unit clauses : 115
% 1.50/0.97 % Non-unit-clauses : 1608
% 1.50/0.97 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2598
% 1.50/0.97 % ...number of literals in the above : 7129
% 1.50/0.97 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Current number of archived clauses : 124
% 1.50/0.97 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1617074
% 1.50/0.97 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1517944
% 1.50/0.97 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3651
% 1.50/0.97 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 63936
% 1.50/0.97 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.50/0.97 % BW rewrite match attempts : 194
% 1.50/0.97 % BW rewrite match successes : 36
% 1.50/0.97 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.50/0.97 % Termbank termtop insertions : 153687
% 1.50/0.97 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4234
% 1.50/0.97
% 1.50/0.97 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.50/0.97 % User time : 0.440 s
% 1.50/0.97 % System time : 0.031 s
% 1.50/0.97 % Total time : 0.471 s
% 1.50/0.97 % Maximum resident set size: 8860 pages
% 1.50/0.97
% 1.50/0.97 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.50/0.97 % User time : 1.920 s
% 1.50/0.97 % System time : 0.115 s
% 1.50/0.97 % Total time : 2.035 s
% 1.50/0.97 % Maximum resident set size: 6656 pages
% 1.50/0.97 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------