%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV280-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:12 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Nat_Ole__add1_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Ole__add1_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(v_evs),X1,tc_nat),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_plus(X1,X2,tc_nat),tc_nat),
cls_Nat_Ole__add1_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV280-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:40:22 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.42 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1864992 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.11/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.42 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.42 % Search class: FUHNS-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.42 % partial match(2): FGHNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1864997 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.42 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.42 % Search class: FUHNS-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.42 % partial match(2): FGHNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.42
% 0.11/0.42 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.42 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.42 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.42 % Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.11/0.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Initial clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.11/0.42 % Processed clauses : 4
% 0.11/0.42 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.11/0.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Generated clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.11/0.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Paramodulations : 2
% 0.11/0.42 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.11/0.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.11/0.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.11/0.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.11/0.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 101
% 0.11/0.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 5
% 0.11/0.42
% 0.11/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.42 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.42 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.42 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.11/0.42
% 0.11/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.42 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.42 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.11/0.42 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.11/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------