↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : SWV280-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:06:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.06s 0.25s
% Output   : Proof 0.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV280-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.19  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/0.19  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 10:24:17 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/0.19  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.25  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 0.06/0.25  
% 0.06/0.25  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.06/0.25  
% 0.06/0.26  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.06/0.26  Axiom 1 (cls_conjecture_0): c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X), c_Event_Oused(v_evs), tc_Message_Omsg) = true.
% 0.06/0.26  Axiom 2 (cls_Nat_Ole__add1_0): c_lessequals(X, c_plus(X, Y, tc_nat), tc_nat) = true.
% 0.06/0.26  
% 0.06/0.26  Goal 1 (cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0): tuple(c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X), c_Event_Oused(Y), tc_Message_Omsg), c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(Y), X, tc_nat)) = tuple(true, true).
% 0.06/0.26  The goal is true when:
% 0.06/0.26    X = c_plus(v_sko__urX(v_evs), X, tc_nat)
% 0.06/0.26    Y = v_evs
% 0.06/0.26  
% 0.06/0.26  Proof:
% 0.06/0.26    tuple(c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(c_plus(v_sko__urX(v_evs), X, tc_nat)), c_Event_Oused(v_evs), tc_Message_Omsg), c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(v_evs), c_plus(v_sko__urX(v_evs), X, tc_nat), tc_nat))
% 0.06/0.26  = { by axiom 1 (cls_conjecture_0) }
% 0.06/0.26    tuple(true, c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(v_evs), c_plus(v_sko__urX(v_evs), X, tc_nat), tc_nat))
% 0.06/0.26  = { by axiom 2 (cls_Nat_Ole__add1_0) }
% 0.06/0.26    tuple(true, true)
% 0.06/0.26  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.06/0.26  
% 0.06/0.26  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------