%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV281-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:13 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 9.73s 2.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 34 ( 19 unt; 4 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 54 ( 21 equ; 23 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 56 ( 11 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oaxioms__1_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
| c_lessequals(X2,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oaxioms__1_0) ).
cnf(cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_nat_3,axiom,
class_Orderings_Oorder(tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',clsarity_nat_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X2),c_Event_Oused(v_evs_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Oadd__left__cancel_0,axiom,
( c_plus(X2,X3,X1) != c_plus(X2,X4,X1)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ocancel__semigroup__add(X1)
| X3 = X4 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_OrderedGroup_Oadd__left__cancel_0) ).
cnf(cls_Nat_Ole__add2_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_plus(X2,X1,tc_nat),tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Ole__add2_0) ).
cnf(cls_Nat_Oadd__0__right_0,axiom,
c_plus(X1,c_0,tc_nat) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Nat_Oadd__0__right_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_nat_27,axiom,
class_OrderedGroup_Ocancel__semigroup__add(tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',clsarity_nat_27) ).
cnf(cls_Datatype__Universe_OLeaf__not__Numb_0,axiom,
c_Datatype__Universe_OLeaf(X1,X2,X3) != c_Datatype__Universe_ONumb(X4,X2,X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Datatype__Universe_OLeaf__not__Numb_0) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
| c_lessequals(X2,X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oaxioms__1_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Public_ONonce__supply__lemma_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
| c_lessequals(X2,X2,X1) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
class_Orderings_Oorder(tc_nat),
clsarity_nat_3 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(X2),X1,tc_nat)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_nat),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_sko__urX(X1)),c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X2),c_Event_Oused(v_evs_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| X1 = X2 ),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs_H),tc_Message_Omsg)
| v_sko__urX(v_evs) = X1 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
v_sko__urX(v_evs) = v_sko__urX(v_evs_H),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( c_plus(X2,X3,X1) != c_plus(X2,X4,X1)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ocancel__semigroup__add(X1)
| X3 = X4 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_OrderedGroup_Oadd__left__cancel_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_lessequals(v_sko__urX(v_evs_H),X1,tc_nat) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,c_plus(X2,X1,tc_nat),tc_nat),
cls_Nat_Ole__add2_0 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( c_plus(X2,X3,X1) != c_plus(X2,X4,X1)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ocancel__semigroup__add(X1)
| X3 = X4 ),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
c_plus(X1,c_0,tc_nat) = X1,
cls_Nat_Oadd__0__right_0 ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
class_OrderedGroup_Ocancel__semigroup__add(tc_nat),
clsarity_nat_27 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(c_plus(X1,v_sko__urX(v_evs_H),tc_nat)),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(X1),c_Event_Oused(v_evs),tc_Message_Omsg)
| X1 = v_sko__urX(v_evs_H) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( c_plus(X2,X1,tc_nat) != X2
| X1 = c_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
c_plus(X1,v_sko__urX(v_evs_H),tc_nat) = v_sko__urX(v_evs_H),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
c_Datatype__Universe_OLeaf(X1,X2,X3) != c_Datatype__Universe_ONumb(X4,X2,X3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Datatype__Universe_OLeaf__not__Numb_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
v_sko__urX(v_evs_H) = c_0,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
c_Datatype__Universe_OLeaf(X1,X2,X3) != c_Datatype__Universe_ONumb(X4,X2,X3),
c_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
X1 = c_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_30]),c_0_23]),c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_32])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV281-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:40:38 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.73/2.38 % Version: 3.5.1
% 9.73/2.38 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 9.73/2.38 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.73/2.38 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.73/2.38 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 9.73/2.38 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 9.73/2.38 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 9.73/2.38 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1865892 completed with status 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 9.73/2.38 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 9.73/2.38 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.73/2.38 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.73/2.38 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 9.73/2.38 % No SInE strategy applied
% 9.73/2.38 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 9.73/2.38 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 9.73/2.38 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 9.73/2.38 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 9.73/2.38 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 9.73/2.38 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 9.73/2.38 % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 9.73/2.38 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 1865901 completed with status 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 9.73/2.38 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 9.73/2.38 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.73/2.38 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.73/2.38 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 9.73/2.38 % No SInE strategy applied
% 9.73/2.38 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 9.73/2.38 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 9.73/2.38 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 9.73/2.38 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 9.73/2.38 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 9.73/2.38 % Preprocessing time : 0.045 s
% 9.73/2.38
% 9.73/2.38 % Proof found!
% 9.73/2.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 9.73/2.38 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.73/2.38 % Parsed axioms : 2938
% 9.73/2.38 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Initial clauses : 2938
% 9.73/2.38 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 9.73/2.38 % Initial clauses in saturation : 2926
% 9.73/2.38 % Processed clauses : 7177
% 9.73/2.38 % ...of these trivial : 204
% 9.73/2.38 % ...subsumed : 3648
% 9.73/2.38 % ...remaining for further processing : 3325
% 9.73/2.38 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 84
% 9.73/2.38 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Backward-subsumed : 33
% 9.73/2.38 % Backward-rewritten : 2303
% 9.73/2.38 % Generated clauses : 16505
% 9.73/2.38 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13912
% 9.73/2.38 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 9.73/2.38 % Paramodulations : 16330
% 9.73/2.38 % Factorizations : 5
% 9.73/2.38 % NegExts : 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Equation resolutions : 163
% 9.73/2.38 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Total rewrite steps : 8275
% 9.73/2.38 % ...of those cached : 4789
% 9.73/2.38 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Propositional check models : 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 9.73/2.38 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 9.73/2.38 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 9.73/2.38 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 9.73/2.38 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 9.73/2.38 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 9.73/2.38 % Current number of processed clauses : 982
% 9.73/2.38 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 53
% 9.73/2.38 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 9.73/2.38 % Negative unit clauses : 7
% 9.73/2.38 % Non-unit-clauses : 921
% 9.73/2.38 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9612
% 9.73/2.38 % ...number of literals in the above : 21637
% 9.73/2.38 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Current number of archived clauses : 2353
% 9.73/2.38 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3170689
% 9.73/2.38 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2065700
% 9.73/2.38 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3394
% 9.73/2.38 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 129552
% 9.73/2.38 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 6
% 9.73/2.38 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4466
% 9.73/2.38 % BW rewrite match successes : 2052
% 9.73/2.38 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Condensation successes : 0
% 9.73/2.38 % Termbank termtop insertions : 308952
% 9.73/2.38 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4234
% 9.73/2.38
% 9.73/2.38 % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.73/2.38 % User time : 1.715 s
% 9.73/2.38 % System time : 0.063 s
% 9.73/2.38 % Total time : 1.778 s
% 9.73/2.38 % Maximum resident set size: 8348 pages
% 9.73/2.38
% 9.73/2.38 % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.73/2.38 % User time : 7.663 s
% 9.73/2.38 % System time : 0.254 s
% 9.73/2.38 % Total time : 7.917 s
% 9.73/2.38 % Maximum resident set size: 6656 pages
% 9.73/2.38 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------