↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV295-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:59 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.70s 0.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   9   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  16   !;   0   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1432,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

fof(f1481,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).

fof(f1526,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-1.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).

fof(f1567,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_12) ).

fof(f1570,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f1573,negated_conjecture,
    v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

fof(f1574,plain,
    c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa) = v_NA,
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f1573]) ).

tcf(c_1540,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1567]) ).

tcf(c_1543,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1570]) ).

tcf(c_1544,negated_conjecture,
    c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa) = v_NA,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1574]) ).

tcf(c_1558,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1526]) ).

tcf(c_1563,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1481]) ).

tcf(c_1613,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1432]) ).

tcf(c_3502,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1543,c_1544]) ).

tcf(c_3707,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1540,c_1544]) ).

tcf(c_7999,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3707,c_1558]) ).

tcf(c_8047,plain,
    c_in(v_NA,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7999,c_1563]) ).

tcf(c_8267,plain,
    c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8047,c_1613]) ).

tcf(c_8269,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8267,c_3502]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SWV295-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.05/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.05/0.30  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:04:50 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.05/0.30  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.05/0.32  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.05/0.32  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.05/0.33  
% 0.05/0.33  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.05/0.33  
% 0.05/0.33  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.06/0.33  % Proving...
% 2.70/0.97  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.70/0.97  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.70/0.97  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.70/0.97  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 4  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 16 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.70/0.97  % ------ Proving...
% 2.70/0.97  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % 
% 2.70/0.97  % clauses                               139
% 2.70/0.97  % conjectures                           3
% 2.70/0.97  % EPR                                   13
% 2.70/0.97  % Horn                                  128
% 2.70/0.97  % unary                                 47
% 2.70/0.97  % binary                                70
% 2.70/0.97  % lits                                  257
% 2.70/0.97  % lits eq                               87
% 2.70/0.97  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.70/0.97  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.70/0.97  % fd_cond                               9
% 2.70/0.97  % fd_pseudo_cond                        29
% 2.70/0.97  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % ------ 
% 2.70/0.97  % Current options:
% 2.70/0.97  % ------ 
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % 
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % ------ Proving...
% 2.70/0.97  % 
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.70/0.97  
% 2.70/0.97  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------