↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SWV295-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:58:48 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.11s 22.90s
% Output   : Refutation 4.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (   2 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  112 (   8   ~;   6   |;   0   &;  98   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   18 (  16 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0   ^;  16   !;   0   ?;  16   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(c_in_decl,type,
    c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt_decl,type,
    c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(c_Public_OshrK_decl,type,
    c_Public_OshrK: $i > $i ).

thf(v_Aa_decl,type,
    v_Aa: $i ).

thf(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair_decl,type,
    c_Message_Omsg_OMPair: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce_decl,type,
    c_Message_Omsg_ONonce: $i > $i ).

thf(v_NAa_decl,type,
    v_NAa: $i ).

thf(c_Message_Omsg_OKey_decl,type,
    c_Message_Omsg_OKey: $i > $i ).

thf(v_K_decl,type,
    v_K: $i ).

thf(c_Message_Oparts_decl,type,
    c_Message_Oparts: $i > $i ).

thf(c_Event_Oknows_decl,type,
    c_Event_Oknows: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy_decl,type,
    c_Message_Oagent_OSpy: $i ).

thf(v_evs1_decl,type,
    v_evs1: $i ).

thf(tc_Message_Omsg_decl,type,
    tc_Message_Omsg: $i ).

thf(c_Event_Oused_decl,type,
    c_Event_Oused: $i > $i ).

thf(v_NA_decl,type,
    v_NA: $i ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Message_Omsg_OMPair ) @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Message_Omsg_OMPair ) @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(3,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_NA
    = ( v_NAa @ c_Message_Omsg_ONonce ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( v_NA
    = ( v_NAa @ c_Message_Omsg_ONonce ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ c_Event_Oused @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ ( c_Message_Oagent_OSpy @ c_Event_Oknows ) @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ c_Event_Oused @ ( A @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( B @ ( c_Message_Oagent_OSpy @ c_Event_Oknows ) @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_evs1 @ ( c_Message_Oagent_OSpy @ c_Event_Oknows ) @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( v_K @ c_Message_Omsg_OKey @ ( v_NAa @ c_Message_Omsg_ONonce @ c_Message_Omsg_OMPair ) @ ( v_Aa @ c_Public_OshrK @ c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt ) @ c_in ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_12) ).

thf(7,plain,
    tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_evs1 @ ( c_Message_Oagent_OSpy @ c_Event_Oknows ) @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( v_K @ c_Message_Omsg_OKey @ ( v_NAa @ c_Message_Omsg_ONonce @ c_Message_Omsg_OMPair ) @ ( v_Aa @ c_Public_OshrK @ c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt ) @ c_in ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( B @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt ) @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( B @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( C @ c_Message_Oparts @ ( B @ ( A @ c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt ) @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_evs1 @ c_Event_Oused @ ( v_NAa @ c_Message_Omsg_ONonce @ c_in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ~ ( tc_Message_Omsg @ ( v_evs1 @ c_Event_Oused @ ( v_NAa @ c_Message_Omsg_ONonce @ c_in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[14,9,12,7,16,8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV295-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.18/20.87  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.18/20.87  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/20.87  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/20.87  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/20.87  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/20.87  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/20.87  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/20.87  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:32:28 UTC 2026
% 0.18/20.88  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/20.88  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.08/21.58  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.44/21.76  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (182ms). 
% 1.44/21.78  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.19/22.16  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.19/22.16  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.30/22.24  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.30/22.27  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 3 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.30/22.28  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.30/22.29  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.30/22.29  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.11/22.90  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.11/22.90  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.11/22.90  % Time passed: 1835ms (effective reasoning time: 1119ms)
% 4.11/22.90  % Axioms used in derivation (3): cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1, cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0, cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0
% 4.11/22.90  % No. of inferences in proof: 13
% 4.11/22.90  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1835 ms resp. 1119 ms w/o parsing
% 4.11/22.97  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.11/22.97  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------