%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV295-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:59 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.64s 1.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.64s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 40 ( 26 unt; 8 def)
% Number of atoms : 104 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 33 ( 19 ~; 14 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 9 usr; 9 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn 20 !; 0 ?; 12 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_12) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
fof(f4,plain,
c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa) = v_NA,
inference(reorient_equations,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).
tcf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa) = v_NA,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tcf(c_58,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
tcf(c_59,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
tcf(c_60,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
tcf(c_82,plain,
~ c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_57]) ).
tcf(c_93,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_57]) ).
tcf(c_106,definition,
iPr_def_10 = c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_107,definition,
iPr_def_11 = c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_108,definition,
iPr_def_12 = c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,iPr_def_11),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_109,definition,
iPr_def_13 = c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).
tcf(c_110,definition,
iPr_def_14 = c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).
tcf(c_111,definition,
iPr_def_15 = c_Message_Oparts(iPr_def_14),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).
tcf(c_112,definition,
iPr_def_16 = c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).
tcf(c_113,definition,
iPr_def_17 = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).
tcf(c_114,plain,
c_in(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_15,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_93,c_110,c_111,c_107,c_108,c_106,c_109]) ).
tcf(c_115,plain,
~ c_in(v_NA,iPr_def_16,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_112]) ).
tcf(c_116,negated_conjecture,
iPr_def_17 = v_NA,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_113]) ).
tcf(c_321,plain,
~ c_in(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_16,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_116]) ).
tcf(c_322,plain,
c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_12,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_116]) ).
tcf(c_325,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(iPr_def_14),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_58]) ).
tcf(c_326,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_in(X0,iPr_def_16,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_15,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_325,c_111,c_112]) ).
tcf(c_334,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_in(iPr_def_17,c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(iPr_def_12,c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_322,c_59]) ).
tcf(c_352,plain,
( c_in(iPr_def_17,c_Message_Oparts(iPr_def_14),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_15,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_334]) ).
tcf(c_353,plain,
( c_in(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_15,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_15,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_352,c_111]) ).
tcf(c_369,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_in(iPr_def_12,c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(iPr_def_13,c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_60]) ).
tcf(c_382,plain,
( c_in(iPr_def_12,c_Message_Oparts(iPr_def_14),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_15,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_369]) ).
tcf(c_383,plain,
( c_in(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_15,tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_15,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_382,c_111]) ).
tcf(c_384,plain,
c_in(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_15,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_383,c_114]) ).
tcf(c_385,plain,
c_in(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_15,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_353,c_384]) ).
tcf(c_387,plain,
c_in(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_16,tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_385,c_326]) ).
tcf(c_388,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_387,c_321]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV295-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:04:48 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.41
% 0.10/0.41 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.41
% 0.10/0.41 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.42 % Proving...
% 1.64/1.28 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.64/1.28 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.64/1.28 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.64/1.28 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 2 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.64/1.28 % ------ Proving...
% 1.64/1.28 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 %
% 1.64/1.28 % clauses 14
% 1.64/1.28 % conjectures 1
% 1.64/1.28 % EPR 3
% 1.64/1.28 % Horn 14
% 1.64/1.28 % unary 11
% 1.64/1.28 % binary 3
% 1.64/1.28 % lits 17
% 1.64/1.28 % lits eq 9
% 1.64/1.28 % fd_pure 0
% 1.64/1.28 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.64/1.28 % fd_cond 0
% 1.64/1.28 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.64/1.28 % AC symbols 0
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 % ------
% 1.64/1.28 % Current options:
% 1.64/1.28 % ------
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 %
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 % ------ Proving...
% 1.64/1.28 %
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.64/1.28
% 1.64/1.28
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------