↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWV300-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:37:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.16s 1.37s
% Output   : Refutation 1.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWV300-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 21:35:25 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.36  Tue Jun 14 21:35:25 2022
% 0.20/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 2728.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.20/0.36  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.20/0.36  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.16/1.37  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.16/1.37  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.16/1.37  number of clauses in intial UL: 12
% 1.16/1.37  number of clauses initially in problem: 15
% 1.16/1.37  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 80
% 1.16/1.37  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 77
% 1.16/1.37  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 86
% 1.16/1.37  absolute distinct symbol count: 31
% 1.16/1.37     distinct predicate count: 1
% 1.16/1.37     distinct function count: 14
% 1.16/1.37     distinct constant count: 16
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.16/1.37  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.16/1.37  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.99 sec ----> 106 [binary,105.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  Length of proof is 10.  Level of proof is 10.
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.16/1.37  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.16/1.37  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  1 [] {+} -c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent).
% 1.16/1.37  2 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  3 [] {+} -c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(A,B,C),c_List_Oset(D,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)|c_in(C,c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,D)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  4 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),c_Message_Osynth(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),C,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(A),C,tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  5 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(B,C,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)| -c_in(B,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(C)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(C)),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  6 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Oanalz(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Message_Oanalz(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  7 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(C)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(C)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  8 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_Message_Oanalz(B),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  9 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Osynth(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  10 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent))| -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(B)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,A)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent).
% 1.16/1.37  11 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_union(B,C,D),D)|c_in(A,C,D)|c_in(A,B,D).
% 1.16/1.37  13 [] {-} c_in(v_evs4,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)).
% 1.16/1.37  14 [] {-} c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_Aaa,v_Ba,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_Ka)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent).
% 1.16/1.37  15 [] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  20 [hyper,14,3] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_Ka))))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  23 [hyper,20,6] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_Ka)))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  24 [hyper,23,9] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_X,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_Ka)))),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4))),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  47 [hyper,24,7] {-} c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4))),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  49 [hyper,47,5,15] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  73 [hyper,49,11,unit_del,2] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4))),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  76 [hyper,73,4] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  100 [hyper,76,8,unit_del,2] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  104 [hyper,100,8] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs4)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 1.16/1.37  105 [hyper,104,10,13] {-} c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent).
% 1.16/1.37  106 [binary,105.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.16/1.37  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  ============ end of search ============
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.16/1.37  
% 1.16/1.37  Process 2728 finished Tue Jun 14 21:35:26 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------