%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV306-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:19 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.31s 0.85s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 39 ( 4 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
v_A = v_Aa,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
v_A = v_Aa,
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),
cls_conjecture_4 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_NA,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV306-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.40 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.40 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.40 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.40 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.40 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.40 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.40 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:39:18 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.40 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.31/0.85 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.31/0.85 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3049756 completed with status 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.31/0.85 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.31/0.85 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.31/0.85 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.85 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 3049765 completed with status 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Result found by G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.31/0.85 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.31/0.85 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.31/0.85 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.85 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.85 % Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 0.31/0.85 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.31/0.85
% 0.31/0.85 % Proof found!
% 0.31/0.85 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.31/0.85 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.31/0.85 % Parsed axioms : 1480
% 0.31/0.85 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Initial clauses : 1480
% 0.31/0.85 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.31/0.85 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1477
% 0.31/0.85 % Processed clauses : 2808
% 0.31/0.85 % ...of these trivial : 8
% 0.31/0.85 % ...subsumed : 157
% 0.31/0.85 % ...remaining for further processing : 2643
% 0.31/0.85 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.31/0.85 % Generated clauses : 1163
% 0.31/0.85 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 268
% 0.31/0.85 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Paramodulations : 1142
% 0.31/0.85 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % NegExts : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Equation resolutions : 21
% 0.31/0.85 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Total rewrite steps : 888
% 0.31/0.85 % ...of those cached : 769
% 0.31/0.85 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.85 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.85 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.85 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.85 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.85 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.85 % Current number of processed clauses : 1217
% 0.31/0.85 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 200
% 0.31/0.85 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Negative unit clauses : 53
% 0.31/0.85 % Non-unit-clauses : 964
% 0.31/0.85 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 357
% 0.31/0.85 % ...number of literals in the above : 776
% 0.31/0.85 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Current number of archived clauses : 1427
% 0.31/0.85 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 692620
% 0.31/0.85 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 671193
% 0.31/0.85 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 125
% 0.31/0.85 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14126
% 0.31/0.85 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % BW rewrite match attempts : 48
% 0.31/0.85 % BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.31/0.85 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.31/0.85 % Termbank termtop insertions : 49958
% 0.31/0.85 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1829
% 0.31/0.85
% 0.31/0.85 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.85 % User time : 0.204 s
% 0.31/0.85 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.31/0.85 % Total time : 0.216 s
% 0.31/0.85 % Maximum resident set size: 5972 pages
% 0.31/0.85
% 0.31/0.85 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.85 % User time : 0.892 s
% 0.31/0.85 % System time : 0.069 s
% 0.31/0.85 % Total time : 0.961 s
% 0.31/0.85 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.31/0.85 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------