%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV306-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:17:12 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.27s 1.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 19 ( 11 ~; 8 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 22 !; 0 ?; 11 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1432,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).
fof(f1526,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).
fof(f1528,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Public_OMPair__used_0) ).
fof(f1529,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Public_OMPair__used_1) ).
fof(f1560,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f1562,negated_conjecture,
v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
fof(f1563,plain,
c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa) = v_NA,
inference(reorient_equations,[],[f1562]) ).
fof(f1566,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).
tcf(c_1531,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1560]) ).
tcf(c_1532,negated_conjecture,
c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa) = v_NA,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1563]) ).
tcf(c_1533,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1566]) ).
tcf(c_1544,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1529]) ).
tcf(c_1545,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1528]) ).
tcf(c_1546,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1432]) ).
tcf(c_1554,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1526]) ).
tcf(c_3491,plain,
~ c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1531,c_1532]) ).
tcf(c_3862,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1533,c_1532]) ).
tcf(c_7966,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3862,c_1554]) ).
tcf(c_7970,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa)))),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7966,c_1546]) ).
tcf(c_7971,plain,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa))),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7970,c_1545]) ).
tcf(c_8040,plain,
c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7971,c_1544]) ).
tcf(c_8041,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8040,c_3491]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV306-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:07:35 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.41
% 0.10/0.41 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.41
% 0.10/0.41 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.42 % Proving...
% 4.27/1.28 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.27/1.28 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 % ------ iProver source info
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.27/1.28 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.27/1.28 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 3 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 16 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 4.27/1.28 % ------ Proving...
% 4.27/1.28 % ------ Problem Properties
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 %
% 4.27/1.28 % clauses 142
% 4.27/1.28 % conjectures 3
% 4.27/1.28 % EPR 13
% 4.27/1.28 % Horn 133
% 4.27/1.28 % unary 49
% 4.27/1.28 % binary 74
% 4.27/1.28 % lits 254
% 4.27/1.28 % lits eq 97
% 4.27/1.28 % fd_pure 0
% 4.27/1.28 % fd_pseudo 0
% 4.27/1.28 % fd_cond 9
% 4.27/1.28 % fd_pseudo_cond 32
% 4.27/1.28 % AC symbols 0
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 % ------
% 4.27/1.28 % Current options:
% 4.27/1.28 % ------
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 %
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 % ------ Proving...
% 4.27/1.28 %
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.27/1.28
% 4.27/1.28
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------