%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV306-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:37:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.40s 0.58s
% Output : Refutation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV306-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 00:46:44 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.36 Wed Jun 15 00:46:44 2022
% 0.14/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 6664.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 This is a Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.36 Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.14/0.36 sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [copy,11,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.40/0.58 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.40/0.58 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.40/0.58 number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.40/0.58 number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.40/0.58 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.40/0.58 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 44
% 0.40/0.58 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 88
% 0.40/0.58 absolute distinct symbol count: 18
% 0.40/0.58 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.40/0.58 distinct function count: 8
% 0.40/0.58 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.40/0.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.40/0.58 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.20 sec ----> 23 [binary,22.1,12.1] {-} $F.
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 6.
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.40/0.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.40/0.58 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 1 [] {-} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.40/0.58 2 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,B)),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Event_Oused(B),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.40/0.58 3 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.40/0.58 4 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(A,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.40/0.58 5 [] {+} -c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(A,B),c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg)|c_in(B,c_Message_Oparts(C),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.40/0.58 6 [] {-} v_NA=c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa).
% 0.40/0.58 8,7 [copy,6,flip.1] {-} c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa)=v_NA.
% 0.40/0.58 9 [] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.40/0.58 10 [copy,9,demod,8] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.40/0.58 12 [back_demod,1,demod,8] {-} -c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.40/0.58 13 [hyper,10,5] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.40/0.58 16 [hyper,13,3] {-} c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.40/0.58 19 [hyper,16,4] {-} c_in(v_NA,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.40/0.58 22 [hyper,19,2] {-} c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg).
% 0.40/0.58 23 [binary,22.1,12.1] {-} $F.
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.40/0.58 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 ============ end of search ============
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 Process 6664 finished Wed Jun 15 00:46:44 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------