↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SWV306-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:20:50 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.08s 0.25s
% Output   : Refutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    9 (   5   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (  11   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f4,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Aa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa))))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_0) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA_H,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f8,f4]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A_H),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Aa))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f10,f6]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs1)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f12,f7]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NAa),c_Event_Oused(v_evs1),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(resolution,[],[f15,f5]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f18,f1]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV306-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.18  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 10:33:46 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.21  Running first-order model finding
% 0.08/0.21  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.25  % (2526895)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.08/0.25  % (2526905)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=2547856359:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.08/0.25  % (2526905) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2526895-2526905"...
% 0.08/0.25  % (2526905)...printing done.
% 0.08/0.25  % (2526905)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.08/0.25  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.25  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.25  % (2526905)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.25  % (2526905)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.08/0.25  % (2526905)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.08/0.25  % (2526905)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.08/0.25  % (2526905)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.08/0.25  % (2526905)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.25  % (2526905)Peak memory usage: 11 MB
% 0.08/0.25  % (2526905)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.08/0.25  % (2526895)Success in time 0.03 s
% 0.08/0.25  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------