%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV307-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:19 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.31s 0.79s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 2 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X2,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_4 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X1,X2),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),
cls_conjecture_6 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Event_Oused(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_NA,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SWV307-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.46 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:41:47 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.31/0.79 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.31/0.79 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.79 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.79 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.79 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.79 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.79 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.79 % new_bool_1 with pid 2899107 completed with status 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.31/0.79 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.79 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.79 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.79 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.79 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.79 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.31/0.79 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.31/0.79 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.79 % Scheduled 9 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.31/0.79 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.79 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2899110 completed with status 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.31/0.79 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.79 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.79 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.79 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.79 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.79 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.31/0.79 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.31/0.79 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.79 % Scheduled 9 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.31/0.79 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.79 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.31/0.79
% 0.31/0.79 % Proof found!
% 0.31/0.79 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.31/0.79 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.31/0.79 % Parsed axioms : 1481
% 0.31/0.79 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1328
% 0.31/0.79 % Initial clauses : 153
% 0.31/0.79 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Initial clauses in saturation : 153
% 0.31/0.79 % Processed clauses : 404
% 0.31/0.79 % ...of these trivial : 28
% 0.31/0.79 % ...subsumed : 27
% 0.31/0.79 % ...remaining for further processing : 349
% 0.31/0.79 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.31/0.79 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.31/0.79 % Generated clauses : 11173
% 0.31/0.79 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10807
% 0.31/0.79 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Paramodulations : 11150
% 0.31/0.79 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % NegExts : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Equation resolutions : 23
% 0.31/0.79 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Total rewrite steps : 348
% 0.31/0.79 % ...of those cached : 54
% 0.31/0.79 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.79 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.79 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.79 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.79 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.79 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.79 % Current number of processed clauses : 345
% 0.31/0.79 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 160
% 0.31/0.79 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Negative unit clauses : 24
% 0.31/0.79 % Non-unit-clauses : 161
% 0.31/0.79 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10556
% 0.31/0.79 % ...number of literals in the above : 11214
% 0.31/0.79 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.31/0.79 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7557
% 0.31/0.79 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6783
% 0.31/0.79 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 0.31/0.79 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 111
% 0.31/0.79 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1327
% 0.31/0.79 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.31/0.79 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.31/0.79 % Termbank termtop insertions : 170900
% 0.31/0.79 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2855
% 0.31/0.79
% 0.31/0.79 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.79 % User time : 0.177 s
% 0.31/0.79 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.31/0.79 % Total time : 0.192 s
% 0.31/0.79 % Maximum resident set size: 4948 pages
% 0.31/0.79
% 0.31/0.79 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.79 % User time : 0.216 s
% 0.31/0.79 % System time : 0.023 s
% 0.31/0.79 % Total time : 0.239 s
% 0.31/0.79 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.31/0.79 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------