↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV307-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:17:13 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.85s 1.23s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   9   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  16   !;   0   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1432,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

fof(f1481,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-0.ax',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).

fof(f1526,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV006-2.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).

fof(f1560,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f1562,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

fof(f1564,negated_conjecture,
    v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

fof(f1565,plain,
    c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB) = v_NA,
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f1564]) ).

fof(f1567,negated_conjecture,
    v_A = v_Ba,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).

fof(f1589,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f1562,f1567,f1567]) ).

tcf(c_2123,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1432]) ).

tcf(c_2162,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1481]) ).

tcf(c_2202,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1526]) ).

tcf(c_2235,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1560]) ).

tcf(c_2237,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1589]) ).

tcf(c_2238,negated_conjecture,
    c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB) = v_NA,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1565]) ).

tcf(c_2385,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2235,c_2238]) ).

tcf(c_2490,plain,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_Ba),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2237,c_2202]) ).

tcf(c_2599,plain,
    c_in(v_NA,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2490,c_2162]) ).

tcf(c_2678,plain,
    c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2599,c_2123]) ).

tcf(c_2679,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2385,c_2678]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV307-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:08:18 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.45  % Proving...
% 0.85/1.23  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.85/1.23  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.85/1.23  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.85/1.23  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.85/1.23  % ------ Proving...
% 0.85/1.23  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  % 
% 0.85/1.23  % clauses                               711
% 0.85/1.23  % conjectures                           8
% 0.85/1.23  % EPR                                   296
% 0.85/1.23  % Horn                                  677
% 0.85/1.23  % unary                                 199
% 0.85/1.23  % binary                                439
% 0.85/1.23  % lits                                  1296
% 0.85/1.23  % lits eq                               276
% 0.85/1.23  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.85/1.23  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.85/1.23  % fd_cond                               28
% 0.85/1.23  % fd_pseudo_cond                        64
% 0.85/1.23  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  % ------ 
% 0.85/1.23  % Current options:
% 0.85/1.23  % ------ 
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  % 
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  % ------ Proving...
% 0.85/1.23  % 
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.85/1.23  
% 0.85/1.23  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------