%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWV307-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:37 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.64s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.55s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV307-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.06/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 18:42:54 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime : % 0.18/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.55/0.64 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.64 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.55/0.64 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.55/0.64 % Transform :cnf % 0.55/0.64 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.55/0.64 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.55/0.64 % 0.55/0.64 % Result :Theorem 0.030000s % 0.55/0.64 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.030000s % 0.55/0.64 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.64 % File : SWV307-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.55/0.64 % Domain : Software Verification (Security) % 0.55/0.64 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Otway Rees % 0.55/0.64 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial. % 0.55/0.64 % English : % 0.55/0.64 % 0.55/0.64 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.55/0.64 % Source : [Pau06] % 0.55/0.64 % Names : % 0.55/0.64 % 0.55/0.64 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.55/0.64 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.08 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.1, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0 % 0.55/0.64 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR) % 0.55/0.64 % Number of literals : 9 ( 1 equ; 4 neg) % 0.55/0.64 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.55/0.64 % Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg) % 0.55/0.64 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty) % 0.55/0.64 % Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty) % 0.55/0.64 % Number of variables : 8 ( 2 sgn) % 0.55/0.64 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN % 0.55/0.64 % 0.55/0.64 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms, % 0.55/0.64 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation. % 0.55/0.64 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation % 0.55/0.64 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary % 0.55/0.64 % axioms. % 0.55/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.64 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.64 ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg) ). % 0.55/0.64 % 0.55/0.64 cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.64 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg) ). % 0.55/0.64 % 0.55/0.64 cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.64 v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB) ). % 0.55/0.64 % 0.55/0.64 cnf(cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0,axiom, % 0.55/0.64 ( ~ c_in(V_c,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) % 0.55/0.64 | c_in(V_c,c_Event_Oused(V_evs),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.55/0.64 % 0.55/0.64 cnf(cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1,axiom, % 0.55/0.64 ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_X,V_Y),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) % 0.55/0.64 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.55/0.64 % 0.55/0.64 cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0,axiom, % 0.55/0.64 ( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(V_K,V_X),c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) % 0.55/0.64 | c_in(V_X,c_Message_Oparts(V_H),tc_Message_Omsg) ) ). % 0.55/0.64 % 0.55/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.64 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.64 % Proof found % 0.55/0.64 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.55/0.64 % SZS output start Proof % 0.55/0.65 %ClaNum:23(EqnAxiom:17) % 0.55/0.65 %VarNum:14(SingletonVarNum:8) % 0.55/0.65 %MaxLitNum:2 % 0.55/0.65 %MaxfuncDepth:4 % 0.55/0.65 %SharedTerms:20 % 0.55/0.65 %goalClause: 18 19 20 % 0.55/0.65 %singleGoalClaCount:3 % 0.55/0.65 [18]E(f2(a1),a9) % 0.55/0.65 [20]~P1(f2(a1),f6(a15),a13) % 0.55/0.65 [19]P1(f8(f11(a10),f7(a9,f7(f3(a10),f3(a14)))),f12(f5(a4,a15)),a13) % 0.55/0.65 [23]P1(x231,f6(x232),a13)+~P1(x231,f12(f5(a4,x232)),a13) % 0.55/0.65 [21]P1(x211,f12(x212),a13)+~P1(f8(x213,x211),f12(x212),a13) % 0.55/0.65 [22]P1(x221,f12(x222),a13)+~P1(f7(x221,x223),f12(x222),a13) % 0.55/0.65 %EqnAxiom % 0.55/0.65 [1]E(x11,x11) % 0.55/0.65 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22) % 0.55/0.65 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33) % 0.55/0.65 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42)) % 0.55/0.65 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f11(x51),f11(x52)) % 0.55/0.65 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x61),f3(x62)) % 0.55/0.65 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f5(x71,x73),f5(x72,x73)) % 0.55/0.65 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f5(x83,x81),f5(x83,x82)) % 0.55/0.65 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f7(x91,x93),f7(x92,x93)) % 0.55/0.65 [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f7(x103,x101),f7(x103,x102)) % 0.55/0.65 [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f12(x111),f12(x112)) % 0.55/0.65 [12]~E(x121,x122)+E(f8(x121,x123),f8(x122,x123)) % 0.55/0.65 [13]~E(x131,x132)+E(f8(x133,x131),f8(x133,x132)) % 0.55/0.65 [14]~E(x141,x142)+E(f6(x141),f6(x142)) % 0.55/0.65 [15]P1(x152,x153,x154)+~E(x151,x152)+~P1(x151,x153,x154) % 0.55/0.65 [16]P1(x163,x162,x164)+~E(x161,x162)+~P1(x163,x161,x164) % 0.55/0.65 [17]P1(x173,x174,x172)+~E(x171,x172)+~P1(x173,x174,x171) % 0.55/0.65 % 0.55/0.65 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.65 cnf(24,plain, % 0.55/0.65 (E(a9,f2(a1))), % 0.55/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,2])). % 0.55/0.65 cnf(57,plain, % 0.55/0.65 (P1(a9,f12(f5(a4,a15)),a13)), % 0.55/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[19,21,22])). % 0.55/0.65 cnf(60,plain, % 0.55/0.65 (P1(f2(a1),f12(f5(a4,a15)),a13)), % 0.55/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[24,57,23,15])). % 0.55/0.65 cnf(66,plain, % 0.55/0.65 ($false), % 0.55/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,60,23]), % 0.55/0.65 ['proof']). % 0.55/0.65 % SZS output end Proof % 0.55/0.65 % Total time :0.030000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------