↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV307-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:17:13 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.67s 6.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  27 unt;  10 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  109 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  19   ~;  14   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  11 usr;  11 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?;  12   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    v_NA = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB) = v_NA,
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Event_Oc_A_58_Aparts_A_Iknows_ASpy_Aevs1_J_A_61_61_62_Ac_A_58_Aused_Aevs1_0) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OMPair__parts_1) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_Oparts_OBody__dest_0) ).

tcf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2)),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
    c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB) = v_NA,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(X1),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X1)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(X0,X1),c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_82,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_NA,c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_105,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_106,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_107,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = c_Public_OshrK(v_A),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_108,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_109,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_110,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_111,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,iPr_def_15),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_112,definition,
    iPr_def_17 = c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_16),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).

tcf(c_113,definition,
    iPr_def_18 = c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs2),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_18])],[]) ).

tcf(c_114,definition,
    iPr_def_19 = c_Message_Oparts(iPr_def_18),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_19])],[]) ).

tcf(c_115,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_NA,iPr_def_10,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_105]) ).

tcf(c_116,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_11 = v_NA,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_106]) ).

tcf(c_117,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_19,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_113,c_114,c_109,c_108,c_110,c_111,c_107,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_330,plain,
    ~ c_in(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_331,plain,
    c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_15) = iPr_def_16,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_334,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,c_Event_Oused(v_evs2),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_Message_Oparts(iPr_def_18),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_113,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_335,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,iPr_def_10,tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_19,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_334,c_105,c_114]) ).

tcf(c_349,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(iPr_def_11,c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(iPr_def_16,c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_331,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_365,plain,
    ( c_in(iPr_def_11,c_Message_Oparts(iPr_def_18),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_19,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_349]) ).

tcf(c_366,plain,
    ( c_in(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_19,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_19,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_365,c_114]) ).

tcf(c_395,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(iPr_def_16,c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_Message_Omsg)
      | ~ c_in(iPr_def_17,c_Message_Oparts(X0),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_408,plain,
    ( c_in(iPr_def_16,c_Message_Oparts(iPr_def_18),tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_19,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_395]) ).

tcf(c_409,plain,
    ( c_in(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_19,tc_Message_Omsg)
    | ~ c_in(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_19,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_408,c_114]) ).

tcf(c_410,plain,
    c_in(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_19,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_409,c_117]) ).

tcf(c_411,plain,
    c_in(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_19,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_366,c_410]) ).

tcf(c_418,plain,
    c_in(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10,tc_Message_Omsg),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_411,c_335]) ).

tcf(c_419,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_418,c_330]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV307-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/5.57  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.57  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.57  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.57  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.57  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.57  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.57  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/5.57  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 19:08:18 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.58  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/5.58  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/5.61  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.62  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.63  
% 0.15/5.63  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/5.63  
% 0.15/5.63  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/5.64  % Proving...
% 1.67/6.49  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.67/6.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.67/6.49  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.67/6.49  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.67/6.49  % ------ Proving...
% 1.67/6.49  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % 
% 1.67/6.49  % clauses                               16
% 1.67/6.49  % conjectures                           2
% 1.67/6.49  % EPR                                   3
% 1.67/6.49  % Horn                                  16
% 1.67/6.49  % unary                                 13
% 1.67/6.49  % binary                                3
% 1.67/6.49  % lits                                  19
% 1.67/6.49  % lits eq                               11
% 1.67/6.49  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.67/6.49  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.67/6.49  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.67/6.49  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.67/6.49  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % ------ 
% 1.67/6.49  % Current options:
% 1.67/6.49  % ------ 
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % 
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % ------ Proving...
% 1.67/6.49  % 
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.67/6.49  
% 1.67/6.49  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------