↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SWV310-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:20:50 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.29s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   8 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   8   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    1 (   0 sgn   1   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1567,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

fof(f1568,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(X0,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

fof(f1569,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

fof(f1910,definition,
    ( spl0_5
  <=> c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f1914,definition,
    ( spl0_6
  <=> c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_6])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f1916,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs2,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f1914]) ).

fof(f1917,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_5
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f1569,f1914,f1910]) ).

fof(f1918,plain,
    spl0_5,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f1567,f1910]) ).

fof(f1919,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f1916,f1568]) ).

fof(f1920,plain,
    ~ spl0_6,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f1919]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_5
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f1917]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    spl0_5,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f1918]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ~ spl0_6,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f1920]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s4,s3]) ).

fof(f1921,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s5]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV310-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.19  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 10:37:48 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.22  Running first-order model finding
% 0.08/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.29  % (274384)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.21/0.29  % (274390)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.21/0.29  % (274390)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=416937763:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.21/0.29  % (274390) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-274384-274390"...
% 0.21/0.29  % (274390)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.29  % (274389)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=3178177594_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.29  % (274390)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.29  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.29  % (274390)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.29  % (274390)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.29  % (274390)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.29  % (274390)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.29  % (274390)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.29  % (274390)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.29  % (274390)Peak memory usage: 14 MB
% 0.21/0.29  % (274390)Instructions burned: 15 (million)
% 0.21/0.29  % (274384)Success in time 0.061 s
% 0.21/0.29  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------