↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SWV312-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:39 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.07  % Problem    : SWV312-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.02/0.07  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.06/0.25  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.25  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.06/0.25  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.06/0.25  % DateTime   : Thu Jun 20 21:34:38 EDT 2024
% 0.06/0.26  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.42  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.46  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.11/0.46  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.46  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.11/0.46  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.11/0.46  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.11/0.46  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.11/0.46  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  % File     : SWV312-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.46  % Domain   : Software Verification (Security)
% 0.11/0.46  % Problem  : Cryptographic protocol problem for Otway Rees
% 0.11/0.46  % Version  : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.11/0.46  % English  :
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  % Refs     : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.11/0.46  % Source   : [Pau06]
% 0.11/0.46  % Names    :
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.46  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.11/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    3 (   2 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
% 0.11/0.46  %            Number of literals    :    4 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
% 0.11/0.46  %            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.11/0.46  %            Maximal term depth    :   11 (   3 avg)
% 0.11/0.46  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.11/0.46  %            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.11/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    1 (   1 sgn)
% 0.11/0.46  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.11/0.46  %            of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.11/0.46  %            The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.11/0.46  %            can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.11/0.46  %            axioms.
% 0.11/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.11/0.46      c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.11/0.46      ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_U,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.11/0.46      ( c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_B,c_Message_Oagent_OServer,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_x,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_B)))))))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent)
% 0.11/0.46      | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs4,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ) ).
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  % Proof found
% 0.11/0.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.46  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.11/0.46  %ClaNum:3(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.11/0.46  %VarNum:1(SingletonVarNum:1)
% 0.11/0.46  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.11/0.46  %MaxfuncDepth:10
% 0.11/0.46  %SharedTerms:34
% 0.11/0.46  %goalClause: 1 2 3
% 0.11/0.46  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.11/0.46  [1]P1(f2(a1,a4,f10(a12,f10(f8(f6(a5),f10(a12,f7(a13))),f8(f6(a4),f10(a14,f7(a13)))))),f3(a15,a11),a11)
% 0.11/0.46  [2]~P1(f2(a4,a1,f10(a12,f10(f9(a5),f10(f9(a4),f10(x21,f8(f6(a4),f10(a12,f10(a14,f10(f9(a5),f9(a4)))))))))),f3(a15,a11),a11)
% 0.11/0.46  [3]~P1(f2(a1,a4,f10(a12,f10(f8(f6(a5),f10(a12,f7(a13))),f8(f6(a4),f10(a14,f7(a13)))))),f3(a15,a11),a11)+P1(f2(a4,a1,f10(a12,f10(f9(a5),f10(f9(a4),f10(a16,f8(f6(a4),f10(a12,f10(a14,f10(f9(a5),f9(a4)))))))))),f3(a15,a11),a11)
% 0.11/0.46  %EqnAxiom
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.47  cnf(4,plain,
% 0.11/0.47     ($false),
% 0.11/0.47     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3]),
% 0.11/0.47     ['proof']).
% 0.11/0.47  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.11/0.47  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------