%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWV314-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:46:40 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.60s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.55s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SWV314-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.12/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 20:07:09 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.19/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.19/0.59 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.19/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.19/0.59 % Transform :cnf % 0.19/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.19/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.19/0.59 % 0.19/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.19/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.19/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.60 % File : SWV314-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.55/0.60 % Domain : Software Verification (Security) % 0.55/0.60 % Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Otway Rees % 0.55/0.60 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial. % 0.55/0.60 % English : % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.55/0.60 % Source : [Pau06] % 0.55/0.60 % Names : % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.55/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v4.0.0, 0.14 v3.4.0, 0.00 v3.2.0 % 0.55/0.60 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 6 unt; 1 nHn; 7 RR) % 0.55/0.60 % Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg) % 0.55/0.60 % Maximal clause size : 6 ( 1 avg) % 0.55/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg) % 0.55/0.60 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty) % 0.55/0.60 % Number of functors : 23 ( 23 usr; 13 con; 0-3 aty) % 0.55/0.60 % Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn) % 0.55/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms, % 0.55/0.60 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation. % 0.55/0.60 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation % 0.55/0.60 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary % 0.55/0.60 % axioms. % 0.55/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.60 c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ). % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.60 ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(v_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K)))),c_List_Oset(v_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ). % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.60 ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ). % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.60 ~ c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ). % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.60 c_in(v_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ). % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.60 c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) ). % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 cnf(cls_OtwayRees_Osecrecy__lemma__dest_0,axiom, % 0.55/0.60 ( ~ c_in(V_evs,c_OtwayRees_Ootway,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) % 0.55/0.60 | ~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(c_Message_Oagent_OServer,V_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V_A),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K))),c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(V_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K)))))),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) % 0.55/0.60 | ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,V_evs)),tc_Message_Omsg) % 0.55/0.60 | c_in(V_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) % 0.55/0.60 | c_in(V_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) % 0.55/0.60 | c_in(c_Event_Oevent_ONotes(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NA,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_NB,c_Message_Omsg_OKey(V_K)))),c_List_Oset(V_evs,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ) ). % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.55/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.60 % Proof found % 0.55/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.55/0.60 % SZS output start Proof % 0.55/0.60 %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.55/0.60 %VarNum:18(SingletonVarNum:6) % 0.55/0.60 %MaxLitNum:6 % 0.55/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:6 % 0.55/0.60 %SharedTerms:34 % 0.55/0.60 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 % 0.55/0.60 %singleGoalClaCount:6 % 0.55/0.60 [4]~P1(a20,a7,a19) % 0.55/0.60 [5]~P1(a21,a7,a19) % 0.55/0.60 [1]P1(a1,a2,f16(a14)) % 0.55/0.60 [2]P1(f3(a17),f11(f5(a4,a1)),a18) % 0.55/0.60 [6]~P1(f8(a4,f13(a22,f13(a23,f3(a17)))),f10(a1,a14),a14) % 0.55/0.60 [3]P1(f6(a9,a20,f13(a22,f13(f12(f15(a21),f13(a22,f3(a17))),f12(f15(a20),f13(a23,f3(a17)))))),f10(a1,a14),a14) % 0.55/0.60 [7]P1(x71,a7,a19)+P1(x72,a7,a19)+~P1(x76,a2,f16(a14))+~P1(f3(x75),f11(f5(a4,x76)),a18)+P1(f8(a4,f13(x73,f13(x74,f3(x75)))),f10(x76,a14),a14)+~P1(f6(a9,x72,f13(x73,f13(f12(f15(x71),f13(x73,f3(x75))),f12(f15(x72),f13(x74,f3(x75)))))),f10(x76,a14),a14) % 0.55/0.60 %EqnAxiom % 0.55/0.60 % 0.55/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.60 cnf(8,plain, % 0.55/0.60 ($false), % 0.55/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4,5,6,3,7]), % 0.55/0.60 ['proof']). % 0.55/0.60 % SZS output end Proof % 0.55/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------