%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV315-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:54:21 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 8.39s 1.77s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 40 ( 8 unt; 6 nHn; 34 RR)
% Number of literals : 78 ( 0 equ; 38 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 57 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-0.ax',cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Set_Oinsert__iff_2,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_insert(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_Oinsert__iff_2) ).
cnf(cls_Public_OSpy__spies__bad__shrK_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-3.ax',cls_Public_OSpy__spies__bad__shrK_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OUn__iff_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-1.ax',cls_Set_OUn__iff_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_Message_OKey__synth__eq_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_OKey__synth__eq_0) ).
cnf(cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV005-2.ax',cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oparts_OInj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_insert(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_Oinsert__iff_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
| ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(X1,c_insert(X4,X2,X3),X3) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Public_OSpy__spies__bad__shrK_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(X1)),c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OFake__parts__insert__in__Un__dest_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
cls_conjecture_5 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_A,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OUn__iff_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ c_in(X2,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(X3)),c_Message_Oparts(X3),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_OKey__synth__eq_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_union(X2,X3,X4),X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X3,X4) ),
c_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_union(c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Message_Oanalz__conj__parts_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),c_Message_Osynth(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(X1),X2,tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_31 ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,c_Message_Oanalz(X2),tc_Message_Omsg)
| c_in(X1,c_Message_Oparts(X2),tc_Message_Omsg) ),
c_0_34 ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(c_Public_OshrK(v_A)),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_38])]),c_0_26]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV315-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.52 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.52 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.52 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.52 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.52 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.52 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.52 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.52 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:40:11 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.52 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.52 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.56 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.39/1.77 % Version: 3.5.1
% 8.39/1.77 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 8.39/1.77 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1491082 completed with status 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.39/1.77 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 8.39/1.77 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 8.39/1.77 % No SInE strategy applied
% 8.39/1.77 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 8.39/1.77 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 1491092 completed with status 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Result found by G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y
% 8.39/1.77 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 8.39/1.77 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 8.39/1.77 % No SInE strategy applied
% 8.39/1.77 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 8.39/1.77 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 8.39/1.77 % Preprocessing time : 0.031 s
% 8.39/1.77
% 8.39/1.77 % Proof found!
% 8.39/1.77 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 8.39/1.77 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.39/1.77 % Parsed axioms : 2943
% 8.39/1.77 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Initial clauses : 2943
% 8.39/1.77 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 8.39/1.77 % Initial clauses in saturation : 2931
% 8.39/1.77 % Processed clauses : 3084
% 8.39/1.77 % ...of these trivial : 29
% 8.39/1.77 % ...subsumed : 216
% 8.39/1.77 % ...remaining for further processing : 2839
% 8.39/1.77 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 211
% 8.39/1.77 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Backward-subsumed : 10
% 8.39/1.77 % Backward-rewritten : 15
% 8.39/1.77 % Generated clauses : 26676
% 8.39/1.77 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 22022
% 8.39/1.77 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 8.39/1.77 % Paramodulations : 26392
% 8.39/1.77 % Factorizations : 1
% 8.39/1.77 % NegExts : 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Equation resolutions : 282
% 8.39/1.77 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Total rewrite steps : 12193
% 8.39/1.77 % ...of those cached : 10540
% 8.39/1.77 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Propositional check models : 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 8.39/1.77 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 8.39/1.77 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 8.39/1.77 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 8.39/1.77 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 8.39/1.77 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 8.39/1.77 % Current number of processed clauses : 2813
% 8.39/1.77 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 623
% 8.39/1.77 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 18
% 8.39/1.77 % Negative unit clauses : 76
% 8.39/1.77 % Non-unit-clauses : 2096
% 8.39/1.77 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 21865
% 8.39/1.77 % ...number of literals in the above : 79562
% 8.39/1.77 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Current number of archived clauses : 36
% 8.39/1.77 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1954516
% 8.39/1.77 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1049070
% 8.39/1.77 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 95
% 8.39/1.77 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 82528
% 8.39/1.77 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 3
% 8.39/1.77 % BW rewrite match attempts : 403
% 8.39/1.77 % BW rewrite match successes : 36
% 8.39/1.77 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Condensation successes : 0
% 8.39/1.77 % Termbank termtop insertions : 523612
% 8.39/1.77 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4253
% 8.39/1.77
% 8.39/1.77 % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.39/1.77 % User time : 1.061 s
% 8.39/1.77 % System time : 0.046 s
% 8.39/1.77 % Total time : 1.107 s
% 8.39/1.77 % Maximum resident set size: 8608 pages
% 8.39/1.77
% 8.39/1.77 % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.39/1.77 % User time : 5.137 s
% 8.39/1.77 % System time : 0.196 s
% 8.39/1.77 % Total time : 5.333 s
% 8.39/1.77 % Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 8.39/1.77 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------